The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Detection of meningococcal carriage by culture and PCR of throat swabs and mouth gargles

Jordens, J. Zoe, Williams, Jeannette N., Jones, Graeme R. and Heckels, John E. (2002) Detection of meningococcal carriage by culture and PCR of throat swabs and mouth gargles Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, pp. 75-79. (doi:10.1128/JCM.40.1.75-79.2002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The standard method for detecting meningococcal carriage is culture of throat swabs on selective media, but the levels of carriage determined depend heavily on the skills of the individuals taking the swab and interpreting the cultures. This study aimed to determine the most sensitive detection method for meningococcal carriage. Throat swabs and saline mouth gargles, obtained from 89 university students, were processed in parallel by conventional culture and TaqMan ctrA PCR. Carriage of meningococci, as detected by the combined methods, was 20%.
The sensitivities of throat swab culture, throat swab PCR, gargle culture, and gargle PCR were 72, 56, 56, and 50%, respectively, and the probabilities that these techniques would correctly identify the absence of carriage (negative predictive value [NPV]) were 93.4, 89.9, 89.9, and 88.8%. Culturing both throat swabs and gargles increased the NPV to 98.6%. The further addition of throat swab PCR increased this to 100%. Testing gargles by both culture and PCR was as sensitive as testing throat swabs by both methods, suggesting that gargles may be a suitable alternative for large-scale screening studies when throat swabs are difficult to obtain, although they required more lengthy laboratory processing. PCR was a useful adjunct to culture for detecting nasopharyngeal carriage, but it failed to detect some nongroupable strains. For maximum sensitivity, a combination of techniques was required. This study indicates the confidence with which health care professionals involved in meningococcal screening can regard laboratory results.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27191
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27191
ISSN: 0095-1137
PURE UUID: b9dfc8ca-6cf9-4aaf-a2eb-34adab1dc6ae

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Apr 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Zoe Jordens
Author: Jeannette N. Williams
Author: Graeme R. Jones
Author: John E. Heckels

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×