Making it Rich and Personal: crafting an institutional personal learning environment
Making it Rich and Personal: crafting an institutional personal learning environment
Many of the communities interested in learning and teaching technologies within higher education now accept the view that a conception of personal learning environments provides a the most realistic and workable perspective of learners’ interactions with and use of technology. This view may not be reflected in the behaviour of those parts of a university which normally purchase and deploy technology infrastructure. These departments or services are slow to change because they are typically, and understandably, risk-averse; the more so, because the consequences of expensive decisions about infrastructure will stay with the organisation for many years. Furthermore across the broader (less technically or educationally informed) academic community, the awareness of and familiarity with technologies in support of learning may be varied. In this context, work to innovate the learning environment will require considerable team effort and collective commitment. This paper presents a case study account of institutional processes harnessed to establish a universal personal learning environment fit for the 21st century. The challenges encountered were consequential of our working definition of a learning environment, which went beyond simple implementation. In our experience the requirements became summarised as “its more than a system, it’s a mindset”. As well as deploying technology ‘fit for purpose’ we were seeking to create an environment that could play an integral and catalytic part in the university’s role of enabling transformative education. Our ambitions and aspirations were derived from evidence in the literature. We also drew on evidence of recent and current performance in the university; gauged by institutional benchmarking and an extensive student survey. The paper presents and analyses this qualitative and quantitative data. We provide an account and analysis of our progress to achieve change, the methods we used, problems encountered and the decisions we made on the way.
White, Su
5f9a277b-df62-4079-ae97-b9c35264c146
Davis, Hugh C
1608a3c8-0920-4a0c-82b3-ee29a52e7c1b
2011
White, Su
5f9a277b-df62-4079-ae97-b9c35264c146
Davis, Hugh C
1608a3c8-0920-4a0c-82b3-ee29a52e7c1b
White, Su and Davis, Hugh C
(2011)
Making it Rich and Personal: crafting an institutional personal learning environment.
International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments.
Abstract
Many of the communities interested in learning and teaching technologies within higher education now accept the view that a conception of personal learning environments provides a the most realistic and workable perspective of learners’ interactions with and use of technology. This view may not be reflected in the behaviour of those parts of a university which normally purchase and deploy technology infrastructure. These departments or services are slow to change because they are typically, and understandably, risk-averse; the more so, because the consequences of expensive decisions about infrastructure will stay with the organisation for many years. Furthermore across the broader (less technically or educationally informed) academic community, the awareness of and familiarity with technologies in support of learning may be varied. In this context, work to innovate the learning environment will require considerable team effort and collective commitment. This paper presents a case study account of institutional processes harnessed to establish a universal personal learning environment fit for the 21st century. The challenges encountered were consequential of our working definition of a learning environment, which went beyond simple implementation. In our experience the requirements became summarised as “its more than a system, it’s a mindset”. As well as deploying technology ‘fit for purpose’ we were seeking to create an environment that could play an integral and catalytic part in the university’s role of enabling transformative education. Our ambitions and aspirations were derived from evidence in the literature. We also drew on evidence of recent and current performance in the university; gauged by institutional benchmarking and an extensive student survey. The paper presents and analyses this qualitative and quantitative data. We provide an account and analysis of our progress to achieve change, the methods we used, problems encountered and the decisions we made on the way.
Text
WhiteSu282010MakingItRichAndPersonal.pdf
- Author's Original
Available under License Other.
Text
WhiteAndDavis2011IJVPLEMakingItRichAndPersonalFinalPrePrint.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Other.
More information
Published date: 2011
Organisations:
Web & Internet Science
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 272030
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/272030
ISSN: 1947-8518
PURE UUID: a3d85540-211f-494f-aec4-2d44a69f9b44
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Feb 2011 10:23
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:03
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Su White
Author:
Hugh C Davis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics