Off-line
--------
Dante Alighieri
 - "Very knowledgeable" about
 - Article "really crap"/"very poor"
 - Added section text; was in Italian WP, not in English; translation with modifications
 - Changed because didn't have accurate information; English version was actually wrong
 - Linked a few words: appeared in 'article underneath'---already created articles

(same)
 - Made a mistake on linking ('the' difference in link name Eng/It)

(same)
 - Changed some text which was incomplete 

Stargate SG-1
 - Loads of discussion; don't know if "they" are going to fix
 - Some edits have been 'redone' (edit wars?)
 - Added a couple of galaxies that gates connect to (fact)

Stargate: The Ark of Truth
 - Added link which was 'missing'
 - Saw term and realised wasn't link
 - Checked target existed by search

List of Torchwood Episodes
 - Correcting mistake on one of episodes (text change)
 - Noticed while looking for next week's episode
 - Understand table markup

(same?)
 - Mistake in word (non-native English); text correction
 - Just language correction

Out of the Rain
 - Spelling

(Normally)
 - Without account
 - Don't like having contributions tracked


On-line <9:35>
-------
[Multiple Units]
 - Never created page before
 - Don't know how to
 - Looked for it in interface; doesn't exist (promped to edit address bar)
 - Edit MU of I; copy first para.
 - Paste into new Summary page
 - Create heading for it, "Republic of Ireland"
 - Copies image
 - Copies "Eletricka" word for heading
 - Scours through article for an image, first paragaph, copied across
 - Difficulty finding image in markup due to floating making vertical apparent position differ from markup position
 - Create summary heading with some general text
P: Now I need to insert the templates in order to make this a proper Wikipedia page.
P: [muttering]
P: Ooh, nonononono [? below]
 - Preview
I: It's nice that it's got that feature. <Safari, regarding closing browser tabs with filled forms?>
P: Yeah, this is very nice, I have to say.
 - Notices that not links; creates such
 - Surprised that some things "are not links" (red because of limited dataset)
 - Taken See Also and External Links sections from both articles
 - Changed those to be "See Also for Republic of Ireland", etc.
 - In right Wikipedia would write from scratch, and not get same content; go an inform self; refer to articles
 - This is idea of content would assemble
 - Paragraph on each, para of comparison with images, external links, etc.
 - If someone needs to update shared text...
 - ...would not use same text, they'd have to make two changes.
 - New country of train "would be a problem".

[Jaws] <21:00>
 - Immediately notices not merged
P: <surprised> This is the same article---for the same person---am I mistaken?---because I've never seen, er...
I: It's the same person.
P: It's the same person but just two different films?
I: Yup.
P: Ok.
 - Skims through text of both articles
 - "Main problem" is that would merge into one article and delete text from each film article
 - Create paragraph about appearance in each film
 - For consistency and so people don't have to edit in both places
P: Yes, that he had metallic teeth, because it's pointless to put it in both of the articles, if you know what I mean.
 - Would copy/past but would try to summarise between both
 - Leave films vs games vs novelisations parts behind
 - Share/enlarge infobox
 - Notices films vs games paragraphs are same sections---reads if same paragraphs---yeah
 - Little differences shouldn't really have happened

[London Underground] <24:15>
 - Puts in first paragraph
 - Would add reference
 - Would put in infobox but can't think of short name for 'started passenger transportation'
 - Links year itself
P: Yeah, link to the year because on Wikipedia many people do that.
[TiL]
 - Wouldn't put it here
 - Would just link to London Underground, as it is
 - Found section, ah, would put it here
 - Adds into text

[Cake] <29:05>
P: The problem with this article is that there will either be loads of links or none, because all the things can be really linked to.
 - Picks most uncommon things
 - Would put form of food so that Wikipedia can categorise as <not actually a category link>
 - People should know flour, sweetening agent...
 - Links buttercream and marzipan; as foreigner, these are the words most ambiguous in English; also 'piped borders'
 - Link to 'special occasions', but not weddings etc. individually, because would ()-ise, and:
 - Wouldn't link things in parentheticals
 - Wouldn't link to flour, sweetening agent etc. as some people would as links would be too much for reading the text
 - Keeping density of links down

[Belgium] <32:15>
 - Finds place in template to add it
 - 'eu_membership_start_date = <date>'
P: Where is it?
 - Quite a period of silently looking over it.
P: Perhaps I have made a mistake.
 - Frustration and syntactic wrangling (remove slashes from date)
P: No. It still does not show.
 - Attempts to change spacing in markup. Preview.
P: Now that should show.
P: It doesn't.
I: No, I'm afraid it won't, like that.
 - Tell that those are template parameters. Didn't know.
 - Never added to infobox; expected it to be as easy as adding it there (like with tables)

[Shelf] <37:20>
 - Looks at one of the types of shelf
 - Looks at what points to that particular shelf
 - Show WLH for Shelf disambig, understood task
 - Fixed River Etherow by opening Shelf, West Yorkshire in new tab, editing RE, confirming correct meaning

[Comments] <40:45>
 - None
 - Results, also see how to handle two articles on same thing, if discussion topic, how to merge discussion topics
 - Amazon

