Budget-Balanced and Nearly Efficient Randomized Mechanisms: Public Goods and Beyond
Budget-Balanced and Nearly Efficient Randomized Mechanisms: Public Goods and Beyond
Many scenarios where participants hold private information require payments to encourage truthful revelation. Some of these scenarios have no natural residual claimant who would absorb the budget surplus or cover the deficit. Faltings proposed the idea of excluding one agent uniformly at random and making him the residual claimant. Based on this idea, we propose two classes of public good mechanisms and derive optimal ones within each class: Faltings' mechanism is optimal in one of the classes. We then move on to general mechanism design settings, where we prove guarantees on the social welfare achieved by Faltings' mechanism. Finally, we analyze a modification of the mechanism where budget balance is achieved without designating any agent as the residual claimant.
158-169
Guo, Mingyu
f5665ce2-6a3b-474d-b3ad-17973ed1e43f
Naroditskiy, Victor
8881263c-ee85-49f2-b658-99c31b490e1d
Conitzer, Vincent
12b912b3-5ec3-4561-9f4f-a01e47329d3c
Greenwald, Amy
e2e9560f-9feb-4aa8-bce3-7921643fcd8f
Jennings, Nicholas R.
ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
2011
Guo, Mingyu
f5665ce2-6a3b-474d-b3ad-17973ed1e43f
Naroditskiy, Victor
8881263c-ee85-49f2-b658-99c31b490e1d
Conitzer, Vincent
12b912b3-5ec3-4561-9f4f-a01e47329d3c
Greenwald, Amy
e2e9560f-9feb-4aa8-bce3-7921643fcd8f
Jennings, Nicholas R.
ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
Guo, Mingyu, Naroditskiy, Victor, Conitzer, Vincent, Greenwald, Amy and Jennings, Nicholas R.
(2011)
Budget-Balanced and Nearly Efficient Randomized Mechanisms: Public Goods and Beyond.
The 7th Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, Singapore.
11 - 14 Dec 2011.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Many scenarios where participants hold private information require payments to encourage truthful revelation. Some of these scenarios have no natural residual claimant who would absorb the budget surplus or cover the deficit. Faltings proposed the idea of excluding one agent uniformly at random and making him the residual claimant. Based on this idea, we propose two classes of public good mechanisms and derive optimal ones within each class: Faltings' mechanism is optimal in one of the classes. We then move on to general mechanism design settings, where we prove guarantees on the social welfare achieved by Faltings' mechanism. Finally, we analyze a modification of the mechanism where budget balance is achieved without designating any agent as the residual claimant.
Text
paper_73.pdf
- Other
More information
Submitted date: 28 September 2011
Published date: 2011
Additional Information:
Event Dates: December 11 - December 14, 2011
Venue - Dates:
The 7th Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, Singapore, 2011-12-11 - 2011-12-14
Organisations:
Agents, Interactions & Complexity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 272897
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/272897
PURE UUID: 23eea1a0-a6b7-4905-b92d-afcc57bcbb91
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Sep 2011 10:55
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Mingyu Guo
Author:
Victor Naroditskiy
Author:
Vincent Conitzer
Author:
Amy Greenwald
Author:
Nicholas R. Jennings
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics