A randomized, double-blind controlled comparison of nefazodone and paroxetine in the treatment of depression: safety, tolerability and efficacy in continuation phase treatment
A randomized, double-blind controlled comparison of nefazodone and paroxetine in the treatment of depression: safety, tolerability and efficacy in continuation phase treatment
We investigated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of nefazodone and paroxetine in the continuation phase of treatment of depression. The study comprised a double-blind, parallel-group comparison over 4 months, of patients who had previously improved following random allocation to nefazodone or paroxetine during an 8-week acute treatment study. Assessments included Clinical Global Impression Scales, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Patient Global Assessment Scale, in addition to a review of reported adverse events, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests. One hundred and eight patients participated in the continuation study (53 received paroxetine, 55 nefazodone) and 73 completed treatment. No clinically relevant differences in antidepressant efficacy were seen. Headache and somnolence were the most common reported adverse events in both treatment groups. Both nefazodone and paroxetine maintain their efficacy in continuation treatment, and both are generally well tolerated.
continuation treatment, major depression, nefazodone, paroxetine
161-165
Baldwin, David S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Hawley, Christopher J.
266b205e-5063-42e1-b0ef-df334b0c4819
Mellors, Karen
1f8edda5-09ea-48dc-a6f9-43e5e754c067
2001
Baldwin, David S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Hawley, Christopher J.
266b205e-5063-42e1-b0ef-df334b0c4819
Mellors, Karen
1f8edda5-09ea-48dc-a6f9-43e5e754c067
Baldwin, David S., Hawley, Christopher J. and Mellors, Karen
(2001)
A randomized, double-blind controlled comparison of nefazodone and paroxetine in the treatment of depression: safety, tolerability and efficacy in continuation phase treatment.
Journal of Psychopharmacology, 15 (3), .
Abstract
We investigated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of nefazodone and paroxetine in the continuation phase of treatment of depression. The study comprised a double-blind, parallel-group comparison over 4 months, of patients who had previously improved following random allocation to nefazodone or paroxetine during an 8-week acute treatment study. Assessments included Clinical Global Impression Scales, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Patient Global Assessment Scale, in addition to a review of reported adverse events, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests. One hundred and eight patients participated in the continuation study (53 received paroxetine, 55 nefazodone) and 73 completed treatment. No clinically relevant differences in antidepressant efficacy were seen. Headache and somnolence were the most common reported adverse events in both treatment groups. Both nefazodone and paroxetine maintain their efficacy in continuation treatment, and both are generally well tolerated.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2001
Keywords:
continuation treatment, major depression, nefazodone, paroxetine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 27517
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27517
ISSN: 0269-8811
PURE UUID: e817ad42-5311-4d6b-a17c-10a32e35bb71
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Apr 2006
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:48
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Christopher J. Hawley
Author:
Karen Mellors
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics