The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sex and segregation: staff attitudes explored

Sex and segregation: staff attitudes explored
Sex and segregation: staff attitudes explored
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to establish whether there was consistency of opinion amongst staff about mixed sex wards and the sexual activity of inpatients. Also to establish what demographic factors, if any, modulated those opinions.
METHOD A 17-item, five-point, questionnaire was supplied to all medical and nursing staff working on five wards of a psychiatric inpatient unit. Demographic details of the respondents were also recorded.
RESULTS Some items produced almost unanimous responses: 92.5% agreeing or strongly agreeing that some inpatients form sexually active relationships that are detrimental to their health. Staff felt that single sex wards should be available but were unsure that they would improve quality of life for either patients or staff. The strongest factor predicting response was profession (doctor or nurse), the responses being significantly different in eight of the 17 items. Doctors were more likely to believe that women's and staff's lives would be better on single sex wards and were less likely to be satisfied with current arrangements. They were also more likely to believe that sex was common among inpatients, and that there was an unofficial place to go in hospitals to have sex. Doctors worried more about the patient choice of sexual partner and believed that health workers should have a role in influencing that choice. Doctors also felt more strongly that patients sometimes form sexually active relationships of benefit to health. Ward was the next most important, being significantly different in four of the 17 questions. Gender and age of respondents produced few differences.
CONCLUSIONS In view of the United Kingdom government commitment to phasing out mixed sex hospital accommodation by 2002 (Safety, privacy and dignity in mental health units - Guidance on mixed sex accommodation, Department of Health, 2000), the doubts of staff about improvement to inpatient quality of life, and their own quality of working life need to be further examined. Staff attitudes generally are more likely to be determined by job or ward of employment than the staff's gender, age, or experience of psychiatry. This may have implications in tailoring training schemes for staff of inpatient psychiatric units.
243-247
Cole, M.
0432c93f-603e-4421-9ae6-e00c8c523fd3
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Thomas, P.
260a29e1-369d-4578-a3df-0e3ba5346608
Cole, M.
0432c93f-603e-4421-9ae6-e00c8c523fd3
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Thomas, P.
260a29e1-369d-4578-a3df-0e3ba5346608

Cole, M., Baldwin, D.S. and Thomas, P. (2003) Sex and segregation: staff attitudes explored. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 7 (4), 243-247. (doi:10.1080/13651500310002364).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to establish whether there was consistency of opinion amongst staff about mixed sex wards and the sexual activity of inpatients. Also to establish what demographic factors, if any, modulated those opinions.
METHOD A 17-item, five-point, questionnaire was supplied to all medical and nursing staff working on five wards of a psychiatric inpatient unit. Demographic details of the respondents were also recorded.
RESULTS Some items produced almost unanimous responses: 92.5% agreeing or strongly agreeing that some inpatients form sexually active relationships that are detrimental to their health. Staff felt that single sex wards should be available but were unsure that they would improve quality of life for either patients or staff. The strongest factor predicting response was profession (doctor or nurse), the responses being significantly different in eight of the 17 items. Doctors were more likely to believe that women's and staff's lives would be better on single sex wards and were less likely to be satisfied with current arrangements. They were also more likely to believe that sex was common among inpatients, and that there was an unofficial place to go in hospitals to have sex. Doctors worried more about the patient choice of sexual partner and believed that health workers should have a role in influencing that choice. Doctors also felt more strongly that patients sometimes form sexually active relationships of benefit to health. Ward was the next most important, being significantly different in four of the 17 questions. Gender and age of respondents produced few differences.
CONCLUSIONS In view of the United Kingdom government commitment to phasing out mixed sex hospital accommodation by 2002 (Safety, privacy and dignity in mental health units - Guidance on mixed sex accommodation, Department of Health, 2000), the doubts of staff about improvement to inpatient quality of life, and their own quality of working life need to be further examined. Staff attitudes generally are more likely to be determined by job or ward of employment than the staff's gender, age, or experience of psychiatry. This may have implications in tailoring training schemes for staff of inpatient psychiatric units.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27551
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27551
PURE UUID: d744884b-1fea-4596-8519-cb50fe66cca4
ORCID for D.S. Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Apr 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Cole
Author: D.S. Baldwin ORCID iD
Author: P. Thomas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×