Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects
Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects
In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands instead of single-handedly. This bimanual advantage has been attributed to timer as opposed to motor variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model; Helmuth and Ivry 1996) and related to the additional sensory consequences of the movement of the extra hand in the bimanual case (Drewing et al. 2002). In the present study the effect of sensory feedback of the movement on this advantage was investigated by comparing the results of a person (IW) deafferented below the neck with those of age-matched controls. IW showed an even more pronounced bimanual advantage than controls, suggesting that the bimanual advantage is not due to actual sensory feedback. These results support another hypothesis, namely that bimanual timing profits from the averaging of different central control signals that relate to each effector's movements.
50-57
Drewing, Knut
983cef9f-c777-40b0-ae75-53bf95222d90
Stenneken, Prisca
eb9f9067-98bc-4cfd-bdb1-338564e50f21
Cole, Jonathan
d119a5ba-9ca3-43db-9d98-950ca225655d
Prinz, Wolfgang
06c4a5f2-b01e-4ac7-a74d-676f02b5b301
Aschersleben, Gisa
f7e336a3-00a2-4701-85f9-d1dd7e1a9fd8
2004
Drewing, Knut
983cef9f-c777-40b0-ae75-53bf95222d90
Stenneken, Prisca
eb9f9067-98bc-4cfd-bdb1-338564e50f21
Cole, Jonathan
d119a5ba-9ca3-43db-9d98-950ca225655d
Prinz, Wolfgang
06c4a5f2-b01e-4ac7-a74d-676f02b5b301
Aschersleben, Gisa
f7e336a3-00a2-4701-85f9-d1dd7e1a9fd8
Drewing, Knut, Stenneken, Prisca, Cole, Jonathan, Prinz, Wolfgang and Aschersleben, Gisa
(2004)
Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
Experimental Brain Research, 158 (1), .
(doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1870-9).
Abstract
In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands instead of single-handedly. This bimanual advantage has been attributed to timer as opposed to motor variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model; Helmuth and Ivry 1996) and related to the additional sensory consequences of the movement of the extra hand in the bimanual case (Drewing et al. 2002). In the present study the effect of sensory feedback of the movement on this advantage was investigated by comparing the results of a person (IW) deafferented below the neck with those of age-matched controls. IW showed an even more pronounced bimanual advantage than controls, suggesting that the bimanual advantage is not due to actual sensory feedback. These results support another hypothesis, namely that bimanual timing profits from the averaging of different central control signals that relate to each effector's movements.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 27565
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27565
ISSN: 0014-4819
PURE UUID: 61b609dd-1e1b-4514-b3de-d3d6a48874a7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Knut Drewing
Author:
Prisca Stenneken
Author:
Jonathan Cole
Author:
Wolfgang Prinz
Author:
Gisa Aschersleben
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics