The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fundamental legal conceptions reconsidered

Fundamental legal conceptions reconsidered
Fundamental legal conceptions reconsidered
Fundamental legal conceptions are considered in relation to the analytical concerns of Hohfeld and Bentham, and also in relation to the normative concerns of constitutional and common law protection of rights and liberties. The use of a square of opposition to expound fundamental conceptions is rejected in favour of "a triangle of possibilities". It is argued that using this device helps to provide a clearer understanding of which conceptions may appropriately be recognised as analytically fundamental, and in turn avoids confusion over the normative treatment of practical situations that may arise through the designation of legal rights and liberties as "fundamental". In particular, the nature of legal liberties, and the priority accorded to legal rights, are both questioned.
0841-8209
41-54
Halpin, Andrew
3962c672-3c4a-48c1-86fb-bdfd583310b6
Halpin, Andrew
3962c672-3c4a-48c1-86fb-bdfd583310b6

Halpin, Andrew (2003) Fundamental legal conceptions reconsidered. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 16 (1), 41-54.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Fundamental legal conceptions are considered in relation to the analytical concerns of Hohfeld and Bentham, and also in relation to the normative concerns of constitutional and common law protection of rights and liberties. The use of a square of opposition to expound fundamental conceptions is rejected in favour of "a triangle of possibilities". It is argued that using this device helps to provide a clearer understanding of which conceptions may appropriately be recognised as analytically fundamental, and in turn avoids confusion over the normative treatment of practical situations that may arise through the designation of legal rights and liberties as "fundamental". In particular, the nature of legal liberties, and the priority accorded to legal rights, are both questioned.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27876
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27876
ISSN: 0841-8209
PURE UUID: 6cc324f3-3356-41ed-abdb-ceadd0daead9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 May 2006
Last modified: 26 Apr 2022 20:41

Export record

Contributors

Author: Andrew Halpin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×