Contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, and contralateral hearing aids with single side cochlear implantation vs. bilateral implantation
Contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, and contralateral hearing aids with single side cochlear implantation vs. bilateral implantation
Our objective was to evaluate the comparative benefit of CROS systems and contralateral hearing aids (bimodal use) in single sided implantees, and contrast this with bilateral (second-side) cochlear implantation. A prospective, randomized cross-over trial was used to evaluate the two systems. Subjects then continued using their preferred system for an acclimatization period. Performance on speech in noise tasks and localization tasks was evaluated. Subjective benefit was assessed by standardized questionnaires. Speech in noise and localization performance for the systems will be presented, and contrasted with bilateral cochlear implant performance. Implications for the feasibility of using CROS systems or hearing aids as alternatives to bilateral implantation will be discussed.
Durst, Chris J.
7dd63742-ca3c-45ba-81fb-fea9f397d46a
Ramsden, R.
893548ca-a5e1-4c7f-a6b4-d7f3f51775e5
Summerfield, A.Q.
af4c7b7f-3d5f-461d-876c-ca962ef8fa18
Lutman, M.E.
765efa2b-f995-4ab4-b9bf-acbb6bb6f890
Strachan, D.
959a182f-42e9-4f21-82b3-ec0d3b15fbe6
2005
Durst, Chris J.
7dd63742-ca3c-45ba-81fb-fea9f397d46a
Ramsden, R.
893548ca-a5e1-4c7f-a6b4-d7f3f51775e5
Summerfield, A.Q.
af4c7b7f-3d5f-461d-876c-ca962ef8fa18
Lutman, M.E.
765efa2b-f995-4ab4-b9bf-acbb6bb6f890
Strachan, D.
959a182f-42e9-4f21-82b3-ec0d3b15fbe6
Durst, Chris J., Ramsden, R., Summerfield, A.Q., Lutman, M.E. and Strachan, D.
(2005)
Contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, and contralateral hearing aids with single side cochlear implantation vs. bilateral implantation.
Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Dallas, USA, 15-19 March 2005.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the comparative benefit of CROS systems and contralateral hearing aids (bimodal use) in single sided implantees, and contrast this with bilateral (second-side) cochlear implantation. A prospective, randomized cross-over trial was used to evaluate the two systems. Subjects then continued using their preferred system for an acclimatization period. Performance on speech in noise tasks and localization tasks was evaluated. Subjective benefit was assessed by standardized questionnaires. Speech in noise and localization performance for the systems will be presented, and contrasted with bilateral cochlear implant performance. Implications for the feasibility of using CROS systems or hearing aids as alternatives to bilateral implantation will be discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Additional Information:
Session: T1-A5
Venue - Dates:
Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Dallas, USA, 15-19 March 2005, 2005-01-01
Organisations:
Human Sciences Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 28200
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28200
PURE UUID: 51bbc6ad-9b35-4a6b-bcdc-9334fbb0b00d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 May 2006
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 20:38
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Chris J. Durst
Author:
R. Ramsden
Author:
A.Q. Summerfield
Author:
M.E. Lutman
Author:
D. Strachan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics