The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period

Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period
Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period
The time course of changes in perceived sound quality after hearing instrument fitting has not been studied systematically. It is possible, for example, that patients may object to additional high frequency gain when fitted, but not after a period of auditory acclimatisation. The aim of this study was to utilise sound quality judgements to compare two frequency responses in new users at 4-week intervals over a 24-week post-fitting period. The null hypothesis was that there would be no change in sound quality judgements over time. A total of 16 elderly subjects were fitted monaurally with the same model of linear, programmable hearing instrument. This was set to a standard response that provided 26–29 dB of real-ear insertion gain at 2000–4000 Hz. This program was worn by the subjects for the duration of the study. All subjects reported greater than four hours of daily use. The alternative response which was used in a paired comparison paradigm, provided a mean gain reduction of 3, 8, 13, and 16 dB at 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz, respectively. Subjects compared the standard and the alternative responses for sound quality along dimensions of comfort, clarity, and overall preference while listening to running speech presented in quiet, steady noise, and speech babble. At the time of fitting there was a small preference for the standard response when judging clarity, but the alternative response was preferred for comfort and preferred overall. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each quality dimension did not reveal any statistically significant change over time. It is concluded that this pattern of preference is unaffected by acclimatisation to amplification, at least over the initial 24 weeks of instrument use.
auditory acclimatisation, sound quality judgements
92-101
Munro, Kevin J.
69fbe5d6-706c-42f8-9c0a-041725c9e10b
Lutman, Mark E.
9a07e2b0-16a7-498d-9d35-0a86ba8b8a8b
Munro, Kevin J.
69fbe5d6-706c-42f8-9c0a-041725c9e10b
Lutman, Mark E.
9a07e2b0-16a7-498d-9d35-0a86ba8b8a8b

Munro, Kevin J. and Lutman, Mark E. (2005) Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period. International Journal of Audiology, 44 (2), 92-101. (doi:10.1080/14992020500031090).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The time course of changes in perceived sound quality after hearing instrument fitting has not been studied systematically. It is possible, for example, that patients may object to additional high frequency gain when fitted, but not after a period of auditory acclimatisation. The aim of this study was to utilise sound quality judgements to compare two frequency responses in new users at 4-week intervals over a 24-week post-fitting period. The null hypothesis was that there would be no change in sound quality judgements over time. A total of 16 elderly subjects were fitted monaurally with the same model of linear, programmable hearing instrument. This was set to a standard response that provided 26–29 dB of real-ear insertion gain at 2000–4000 Hz. This program was worn by the subjects for the duration of the study. All subjects reported greater than four hours of daily use. The alternative response which was used in a paired comparison paradigm, provided a mean gain reduction of 3, 8, 13, and 16 dB at 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz, respectively. Subjects compared the standard and the alternative responses for sound quality along dimensions of comfort, clarity, and overall preference while listening to running speech presented in quiet, steady noise, and speech babble. At the time of fitting there was a small preference for the standard response when judging clarity, but the alternative response was preferred for comfort and preferred overall. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each quality dimension did not reveal any statistically significant change over time. It is concluded that this pattern of preference is unaffected by acclimatisation to amplification, at least over the initial 24 weeks of instrument use.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005
Keywords: auditory acclimatisation, sound quality judgements
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 28272
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28272
PURE UUID: 89fa58dc-5498-4b64-836b-e0b5fc8921f9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kevin J. Munro
Author: Mark E. Lutman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×