Auditory localisation abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients
Auditory localisation abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients
Objective: To quantify binaural advantage for auditory localization in the horizontal plane by bilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Also, to determine whether the use of dual microphones with one implant improves localization.
Methods: Twenty subjects from the UK multicenter trial of bilateral cochlear implantation with Nucleus 24 K/M device were recruited. Sound localization was assessed in an anechoic room with an 11-loudspeaker array under four test conditions: right CI, left CI, binaural CI, and dual microphone. Two runs were undertaken for each of five stimuli (speech, tones, noise, transients, and reverberant speech). Order of conditions was counterbalanced across subjects.
Results: Mean localization error with bilateral implants was 24[degrees] compared with 67[degrees] for monaural implant and dual microphone conditions (chance performance is 65[degrees]). Normal controls average 2 to 3[degrees] in similar conditions. Binaural performance was significantly better than monaural performance for all subjects, for all stimulus types, and for different sound sources. Only small differences in performance with different stimuli were observed.
Conclusions: Bilateral cochlear implantation with the Nucleus 24 device provides marked improvement in horizontal plane localization abilities compared with unilateral CI use for a range of stimuli having different spectral and temporal characteristics. Benefit was obtained by all subjects, for all stimulus types, and for all sound directions. However, binaural performance was still worse than that obtained by normal hearing listeners and hearing aid users with the same methodology. Monaural localization performance was at chance. There is no benefit for localization with dual microphones.
965-971
Verschuur, Carl A.
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
Ramsden, Richard
dc08b04a-08d9-4570-a61d-300a50898320
Greenham, Paula
1b4f172f-1549-4a3a-a3c6-6f766fd9b09c
O'Driscoll, Martin
84cb2cca-f10a-47a6-92b7-5c041f70c5e8
2005
Verschuur, Carl A.
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
Ramsden, Richard
dc08b04a-08d9-4570-a61d-300a50898320
Greenham, Paula
1b4f172f-1549-4a3a-a3c6-6f766fd9b09c
O'Driscoll, Martin
84cb2cca-f10a-47a6-92b7-5c041f70c5e8
Verschuur, Carl A., Lutman, Mark E., Ramsden, Richard, Greenham, Paula and O'Driscoll, Martin
(2005)
Auditory localisation abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
Otology & Neurotology, 26 (5), .
(doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000185073.81070.07).
Abstract
Objective: To quantify binaural advantage for auditory localization in the horizontal plane by bilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Also, to determine whether the use of dual microphones with one implant improves localization.
Methods: Twenty subjects from the UK multicenter trial of bilateral cochlear implantation with Nucleus 24 K/M device were recruited. Sound localization was assessed in an anechoic room with an 11-loudspeaker array under four test conditions: right CI, left CI, binaural CI, and dual microphone. Two runs were undertaken for each of five stimuli (speech, tones, noise, transients, and reverberant speech). Order of conditions was counterbalanced across subjects.
Results: Mean localization error with bilateral implants was 24[degrees] compared with 67[degrees] for monaural implant and dual microphone conditions (chance performance is 65[degrees]). Normal controls average 2 to 3[degrees] in similar conditions. Binaural performance was significantly better than monaural performance for all subjects, for all stimulus types, and for different sound sources. Only small differences in performance with different stimuli were observed.
Conclusions: Bilateral cochlear implantation with the Nucleus 24 device provides marked improvement in horizontal plane localization abilities compared with unilateral CI use for a range of stimuli having different spectral and temporal characteristics. Benefit was obtained by all subjects, for all stimulus types, and for all sound directions. However, binaural performance was still worse than that obtained by normal hearing listeners and hearing aid users with the same methodology. Monaural localization performance was at chance. There is no benefit for localization with dual microphones.
Text
28305.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2005
Organisations:
Human Sciences Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 28305
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28305
ISSN: 1531-7129
PURE UUID: 87390b9e-1331-4c93-b5e5-7789b9d226f0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mark E. Lutman
Author:
Richard Ramsden
Author:
Paula Greenham
Author:
Martin O'Driscoll
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics