Selection of response measurement locations to improve inverse force determination
Selection of response measurement locations to improve inverse force determination
The forces obtained by inverse methods are prone to errors. These arise due to a combination of errors in the measurements and high condition numbers in the matrix of transfer functions to be inverted. Ill-conditioning of the frequency response function matrix causes measurement errors to be magnified significantly. When the condition numbers are small, the measurement errors simply propagate without much amplification. Due to modal behaviour of the structure, the condition numbers can vary significantly over the frequency range and with the spatial location of the response measurements.
The spatial variation can be quite considerable across the structure. The potential for using this characteristic to improve force determination is explored in this paper as an alternative to matrix regularization methods. The aim is to reduce error magnification in inverse methods by an ‘optimal’ spatial distribution of response locations. A method is proposed which is based on the minimization of the average condition number across the frequency range. If many possible locations are available, however, this can involve excessive calculation. An approximate method is therefore proposed which results in consistently good location selection for use in inverse force determination but involves much less computational effort. The error reduction in reconstructed forces is found to be significant in numerical simulations on a simply supported plate and in validation experiments.
inverse force determination, sensor location selection, condition numbers, structure-borne noise, transfer path analysis, inverse problems
797-818
Thite, A.N.
c3db753e-656c-4efe-9195-398ac5e7f6eb
Thompson, D.J.
bca37fd3-d692-4779-b663-5916b01edae5
2006
Thite, A.N.
c3db753e-656c-4efe-9195-398ac5e7f6eb
Thompson, D.J.
bca37fd3-d692-4779-b663-5916b01edae5
Thite, A.N. and Thompson, D.J.
(2006)
Selection of response measurement locations to improve inverse force determination.
Applied Acoustics, 67 (8), .
(doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.01.001).
Abstract
The forces obtained by inverse methods are prone to errors. These arise due to a combination of errors in the measurements and high condition numbers in the matrix of transfer functions to be inverted. Ill-conditioning of the frequency response function matrix causes measurement errors to be magnified significantly. When the condition numbers are small, the measurement errors simply propagate without much amplification. Due to modal behaviour of the structure, the condition numbers can vary significantly over the frequency range and with the spatial location of the response measurements.
The spatial variation can be quite considerable across the structure. The potential for using this characteristic to improve force determination is explored in this paper as an alternative to matrix regularization methods. The aim is to reduce error magnification in inverse methods by an ‘optimal’ spatial distribution of response locations. A method is proposed which is based on the minimization of the average condition number across the frequency range. If many possible locations are available, however, this can involve excessive calculation. An approximate method is therefore proposed which results in consistently good location selection for use in inverse force determination but involves much less computational effort. The error reduction in reconstructed forces is found to be significant in numerical simulations on a simply supported plate and in validation experiments.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
inverse force determination, sensor location selection, condition numbers, structure-borne noise, transfer path analysis, inverse problems
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 28432
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28432
ISSN: 0003-682X
PURE UUID: 7ae47a79-245a-45c9-96f4-02861dd75e72
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.N. Thite
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics