The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nonlinear subjective and biodynamic responses to continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction

Nonlinear subjective and biodynamic responses to continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction
Nonlinear subjective and biodynamic responses to continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction
The effect of the magnitude of continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction on both subjective and biodynamic responses of human subjects has been investigated experimentally. Additionally, the relation between the subjective responses and the dynamic responses has also been studied. Twelve subjects were exposed to sinusoidal continuous vibrations at five frequencies (3.15–8.0 Hz) and at three magnitudes (0.5–2.0 m s?2 rms). They were also exposed to transient vibrations that were modulated one-and-half cycle sinusoidal waveforms at the same frequencies as the continuous vibrations and at three magnitudes corresponding to the magnitudes used for the continuous vibrations. Discomfort was measured by the method of magnitude estimation with reference stimuli having frequency components in the middle of the frequency range used in this study. The driving-point dynamic responses (the ratio between the force and the motion, i.e., acceleration and velocity, at the driving point) were also measured and divided by the responses to the reference stimuli used in the measurement of discomfort so as to allow the comparison of the dynamic responses with the discomfort responses. Both the discomfort estimates and the normalised driving-point dynamic responses were influenced by the stimuli magnitudes, especially with the continuous vibration. At 3.15 and 4.0 Hz, the discomfort estimates and the normalised mechanical impedance and apparent mass increased significantly with increases in vibration magnitude from 0.5–2.0 m s?2 rms. Magnitude estimates for discomfort were correlated with the normalised mechanical impedance and apparent mass in the frequency range investigated. For the transient vibrations, the discomfort estimates and the driving-point dynamic responses were interpreted as responses in frequency bands around the fundamental frequency of the input motion. The results indicate similar nonlinearities in discomfort and driving-point dynamic responses associated with the principal body response within the range 3.15–8 Hz. The nonlinearity in discomfort at these frequencies may be partially caused by the nonlinear dynamic response of the body and is sufficient to require consideration in methods of predicting discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration.
0022-460X
919-937
Matsumoto, Yasunao
738b5a98-cadc-41e5-83ae-b71690712c72
Griffin, Michael J.
4b3fc50c-f216-443f-a329-67e450d88bda
Matsumoto, Yasunao
738b5a98-cadc-41e5-83ae-b71690712c72
Griffin, Michael J.
4b3fc50c-f216-443f-a329-67e450d88bda

Matsumoto, Yasunao and Griffin, Michael J. (2005) Nonlinear subjective and biodynamic responses to continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 287 (4-5), 919-937. (doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2004.12.024).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The effect of the magnitude of continuous and transient whole-body vibration in the vertical direction on both subjective and biodynamic responses of human subjects has been investigated experimentally. Additionally, the relation between the subjective responses and the dynamic responses has also been studied. Twelve subjects were exposed to sinusoidal continuous vibrations at five frequencies (3.15–8.0 Hz) and at three magnitudes (0.5–2.0 m s?2 rms). They were also exposed to transient vibrations that were modulated one-and-half cycle sinusoidal waveforms at the same frequencies as the continuous vibrations and at three magnitudes corresponding to the magnitudes used for the continuous vibrations. Discomfort was measured by the method of magnitude estimation with reference stimuli having frequency components in the middle of the frequency range used in this study. The driving-point dynamic responses (the ratio between the force and the motion, i.e., acceleration and velocity, at the driving point) were also measured and divided by the responses to the reference stimuli used in the measurement of discomfort so as to allow the comparison of the dynamic responses with the discomfort responses. Both the discomfort estimates and the normalised driving-point dynamic responses were influenced by the stimuli magnitudes, especially with the continuous vibration. At 3.15 and 4.0 Hz, the discomfort estimates and the normalised mechanical impedance and apparent mass increased significantly with increases in vibration magnitude from 0.5–2.0 m s?2 rms. Magnitude estimates for discomfort were correlated with the normalised mechanical impedance and apparent mass in the frequency range investigated. For the transient vibrations, the discomfort estimates and the driving-point dynamic responses were interpreted as responses in frequency bands around the fundamental frequency of the input motion. The results indicate similar nonlinearities in discomfort and driving-point dynamic responses associated with the principal body response within the range 3.15–8 Hz. The nonlinearity in discomfort at these frequencies may be partially caused by the nonlinear dynamic response of the body and is sufficient to require consideration in methods of predicting discomfort caused by vertical whole-body vibration.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 28520
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28520
ISSN: 0022-460X
PURE UUID: 09a1a255-aa97-42b7-9004-e56958386306

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Yasunao Matsumoto
Author: Michael J. Griffin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×