Incomplete detection in enumeration surveys: Whither distance sampling?
Incomplete detection in enumeration surveys: Whither distance sampling?
We consider the problem of undercount or incomplete detection in enumeration surveys which are intended to estimate population counts or population abundance. The problem is widespread in ecology but also occurs in other surveys: The census undercount is a well-known example of the problem. After framing the problem in a general context, we focus on line transect sampling and the distance sampling methodology which has been widely applied in surveys of ecological populations. We describe distance sampling data and present a graphical derivation of the distance sampling estimator. Our graphical analysis leads to a new expression for the distance sampling estimator which gives useful insights into the nature of the estimator. We discuss the uniformity assumption on which distance sampling depends and describe the properties of the distance sampling estimator when uniformity does not hold. We then explore the relationship between this and other evaluations of distance sampling. We mention briefly some statistical ideas for treating the general incomplete detection problem and conclude with some reflections on general insights arising from the research.
abundance estimation, calibration, detection function, distance sampling, line transect, undercount
13-22
Welsh, A.H.
27640871-afff-4d45-a191-8a72abee4c1a
2002
Welsh, A.H.
27640871-afff-4d45-a191-8a72abee4c1a
Welsh, A.H.
(2002)
Incomplete detection in enumeration surveys: Whither distance sampling?
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 44 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/1467-842X.00204).
Abstract
We consider the problem of undercount or incomplete detection in enumeration surveys which are intended to estimate population counts or population abundance. The problem is widespread in ecology but also occurs in other surveys: The census undercount is a well-known example of the problem. After framing the problem in a general context, we focus on line transect sampling and the distance sampling methodology which has been widely applied in surveys of ecological populations. We describe distance sampling data and present a graphical derivation of the distance sampling estimator. Our graphical analysis leads to a new expression for the distance sampling estimator which gives useful insights into the nature of the estimator. We discuss the uniformity assumption on which distance sampling depends and describe the properties of the distance sampling estimator when uniformity does not hold. We then explore the relationship between this and other evaluations of distance sampling. We mention briefly some statistical ideas for treating the general incomplete detection problem and conclude with some reflections on general insights arising from the research.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Keywords:
abundance estimation, calibration, detection function, distance sampling, line transect, undercount
Organisations:
Statistics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 29940
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/29940
ISSN: 1369-1473
PURE UUID: a0a70d19-1a86-47dd-b120-80c5c75c5873
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:36
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.H. Welsh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics