The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Stepwise multiple tests for successive comparisons

Stepwise multiple tests for successive comparisons
Stepwise multiple tests for successive comparisons
Suppose that the k treatments under comparison are ordered in a certain way. For example, they may be a sequence of increasing dose levels of a drug. It is interesting to look directly at the successive differences between the treatment effects µi's, namely the set of differences µ2132,…,µkk-1. Lee and Spurrier (J. Statist. Plann. Inference 43 (1995) 323) propose a one-sided and a two-sided simultaneous confidence interval procedures for making successive comparisons between treatments. In this paper we develop step-down and step-up tests for testing the families of hypotheses.
Hi0i+1i = 0 vs Hiai+1i > 0, i=1,...,k-1 (one-sided alternatives) Hi0i+1i = 0 vs Hiai+1i ≠ 0, i=1,...,k-1 (two-sided alternatives)

These stepwise tests are uniformly more powerful than the simultaneous confidence interval procedures in terms of rejection of the null hypotheses, though the simultaneous confidence interval procedures provide information on the magnitudes of the µi+1i's. The critical constants required for applying these multiple tests are provided, and the tests are illustrated with a numerical example.
critical constants, familywise error rate, multiple comparisons, multivariate-t distribution, simultaneous confidence intervals
0167-9473
189-199
Liu, W.
b64150aa-d935-4209-804d-24c1b97e024a
Somerville, P.
b459fa9a-b948-40cb-81ef-4076979b4946
Liu, W.
b64150aa-d935-4209-804d-24c1b97e024a
Somerville, P.
b459fa9a-b948-40cb-81ef-4076979b4946

Liu, W. and Somerville, P. (2004) Stepwise multiple tests for successive comparisons. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 46 (1), 189-199. (doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00137-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Suppose that the k treatments under comparison are ordered in a certain way. For example, they may be a sequence of increasing dose levels of a drug. It is interesting to look directly at the successive differences between the treatment effects µi's, namely the set of differences µ2132,…,µkk-1. Lee and Spurrier (J. Statist. Plann. Inference 43 (1995) 323) propose a one-sided and a two-sided simultaneous confidence interval procedures for making successive comparisons between treatments. In this paper we develop step-down and step-up tests for testing the families of hypotheses.
Hi0i+1i = 0 vs Hiai+1i > 0, i=1,...,k-1 (one-sided alternatives) Hi0i+1i = 0 vs Hiai+1i ≠ 0, i=1,...,k-1 (two-sided alternatives)

These stepwise tests are uniformly more powerful than the simultaneous confidence interval procedures in terms of rejection of the null hypotheses, though the simultaneous confidence interval procedures provide information on the magnitudes of the µi+1i's. The critical constants required for applying these multiple tests are provided, and the tests are illustrated with a numerical example.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: critical constants, familywise error rate, multiple comparisons, multivariate-t distribution, simultaneous confidence intervals
Organisations: Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 30121
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/30121
ISSN: 0167-9473
PURE UUID: e43641cf-c468-4a2a-a958-cb39e1f02f43
ORCID for W. Liu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4719-0345

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: W. Liu ORCID iD
Author: P. Somerville

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×