The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: How clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos.

Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: How clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos.
Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: How clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos.
Placebos are an essential tool in randomised clinical trials, where they are used to control for bias and contextual healing effects. Placebos and their effects are also studied from multiple diverse perspectives, but the perspectives of placebo recipients are seldom considered. Research shows that people form cognitive and affective representations of active treatments such as medicines, and that they use these representations to guide their behaviour; it seems reasonable to suggest that people might also think about and develop representations of placebos. We adopted a qualitative approach to examine in detail how participants in one RCT, conducted in the USA, conceptualised placebos. 12 people were interviewed 3 times each, at the start, middle, and end of a trial of placebo effects and acupuncture for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). The interview data were analysed inductively and we identified four ways in which the participants conceptualised placebos: placebos are necessary for research; placebo effects are fake; placebo acupuncture is not real acupuncture; placebos have real effects mediated by psychological mechanisms. Participants' conceptualisations of placebos were dynamic and situated in a broader psychological and socio-cultural context. Seeing placebo effects as legitimate seemed to be facilitated by having more holistic models of healing, viewing IBS as psychological, and seeing treatment as multifactorial. However, some participants maintained a negative view of placebo effects (e.g. as illusions) that was apparently inconsistent with their other beliefs (e.g. in mind-body healing mechanisms). This may indicate a dominance of negative discourses around placebos at a socio-cultural level. Negative views of placebos are inconsistent with evidence that placebo treatments can have positive effects on symptoms. RCT participants should be informed about potential benefits of placebo treatments to avoid misunderstandings and unease. Future work should improve methods of providing participants with full accurate information about placebos and their effects.
USA, placebo, placebo effect, Illness cognition, informed consent, acupuncture, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, IBS
0277-9536
767-774
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Jacobson, Eric E.
c98f8690-307a-4e59-a78d-3d2f5c394fc7
Shaw, Jessica R.
c711ec8d-18bc-4fd7-bc96-559f845c5511
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
6cd4a592-d697-4fed-8eaf-980b2e5f860d
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Jacobson, Eric E.
c98f8690-307a-4e59-a78d-3d2f5c394fc7
Shaw, Jessica R.
c711ec8d-18bc-4fd7-bc96-559f845c5511
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
6cd4a592-d697-4fed-8eaf-980b2e5f860d

Bishop, Felicity L., Jacobson, Eric E., Shaw, Jessica R. and Kaptchuk, Ted J. (2012) Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: How clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos. Social Science & Medicine, 74 (5), 767-774. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.020). (PMID:22285289)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Placebos are an essential tool in randomised clinical trials, where they are used to control for bias and contextual healing effects. Placebos and their effects are also studied from multiple diverse perspectives, but the perspectives of placebo recipients are seldom considered. Research shows that people form cognitive and affective representations of active treatments such as medicines, and that they use these representations to guide their behaviour; it seems reasonable to suggest that people might also think about and develop representations of placebos. We adopted a qualitative approach to examine in detail how participants in one RCT, conducted in the USA, conceptualised placebos. 12 people were interviewed 3 times each, at the start, middle, and end of a trial of placebo effects and acupuncture for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). The interview data were analysed inductively and we identified four ways in which the participants conceptualised placebos: placebos are necessary for research; placebo effects are fake; placebo acupuncture is not real acupuncture; placebos have real effects mediated by psychological mechanisms. Participants' conceptualisations of placebos were dynamic and situated in a broader psychological and socio-cultural context. Seeing placebo effects as legitimate seemed to be facilitated by having more holistic models of healing, viewing IBS as psychological, and seeing treatment as multifactorial. However, some participants maintained a negative view of placebo effects (e.g. as illusions) that was apparently inconsistent with their other beliefs (e.g. in mind-body healing mechanisms). This may indicate a dominance of negative discourses around placebos at a socio-cultural level. Negative views of placebos are inconsistent with evidence that placebo treatments can have positive effects on symptoms. RCT participants should be informed about potential benefits of placebo treatments to avoid misunderstandings and unease. Future work should improve methods of providing participants with full accurate information about placebos and their effects.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 18 January 2012
Published date: March 2012
Keywords: USA, placebo, placebo effect, Illness cognition, informed consent, acupuncture, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, IBS
Organisations: Human Wellbeing, Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 301226
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/301226
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: 17061623-e4ff-4cbb-910d-8a34b0244007
ORCID for Felicity L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Feb 2012 10:33
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eric E. Jacobson
Author: Jessica R. Shaw
Author: Ted J. Kaptchuk

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×