Compatibility between differentiated networks
Compatibility between differentiated networks
This paper develops a generalised model of network competition when consumers vary in their preferences for network size and location, and networks are vertically and horizontally differentiated. The effect of compatibility on the degree of competition between the networks is analysed. Two effects are identified as central to determining networks' incentives towards compatibility. Compatibility decreases vertical differentiation (and hence increases competition); but it also decreases the importance of market share (and so decreases competition). Which effect dominates depends on the relative importance of horizontal and vertical aspects in consumers' utilities. When network size is a relatively important factor in consumers' utilities, neither the larger nor smaller network in the unique asymmetric equilibrium wishes to be compatible. When horizontal aspects are important, both networks wish to be compatible. For intermediate cases, the larger network does not wish to be compatible, in contrast to the smaller network. The model may explain the dynamics of network industries, particularly interconnection agreements between Internet service providers.
University of Southampton
Mason, R.
1a906445-3ab5-4208-a0fc-4df6e51a2b72
January 1999
Mason, R.
1a906445-3ab5-4208-a0fc-4df6e51a2b72
Mason, R.
(1999)
Compatibility between differentiated networks
(Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics, 9909)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
Abstract
This paper develops a generalised model of network competition when consumers vary in their preferences for network size and location, and networks are vertically and horizontally differentiated. The effect of compatibility on the degree of competition between the networks is analysed. Two effects are identified as central to determining networks' incentives towards compatibility. Compatibility decreases vertical differentiation (and hence increases competition); but it also decreases the importance of market share (and so decreases competition). Which effect dominates depends on the relative importance of horizontal and vertical aspects in consumers' utilities. When network size is a relatively important factor in consumers' utilities, neither the larger nor smaller network in the unique asymmetric equilibrium wishes to be compatible. When horizontal aspects are important, both networks wish to be compatible. For intermediate cases, the larger network does not wish to be compatible, in contrast to the smaller network. The model may explain the dynamics of network industries, particularly interconnection agreements between Internet service providers.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33144
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33144
PURE UUID: 67a5f017-ab16-42f6-ae9d-106eafcb0323
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:19
Export record
Contributors
Author:
R. Mason
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics