Costly bargaining and renegotiation
Costly bargaining and renegotiation
We identify the inefficiencies that arise when negotiation between two parties takes place in the presence of transaction costs. First, for some values of these costs it is efficient to reach an agreement but the unique equilibrium outcome is one in which agreement is never reached. Secondly, even when there are equilibria in which an agreement is reached, we find that the model always has an equilibrium in which agreement is never reached, as well as equilibria in which agreement is delayed for an arbitrary length of time.
Finally, the only way in which the parties can reach an agreement in equilibrium is by using inefficient punishments for (some of) the opponent's deviations. We argue that this implies that, when the parties are given the opportunity to renegotiate out of these inefficiencies, the only equilibrium outcome which survives is the one in which agreement is never reached, regardless of the value of the transaction costs.
University of Southampton
Anderlini, L.
663a49c7-c623-4b58-ac94-0749c332a713
Felli, L.
b53914b7-96ef-4ec0-b909-51db772ac135
January 1999
Anderlini, L.
663a49c7-c623-4b58-ac94-0749c332a713
Felli, L.
b53914b7-96ef-4ec0-b909-51db772ac135
Anderlini, L. and Felli, L.
(1999)
Costly bargaining and renegotiation
(Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics, 9910)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
Abstract
We identify the inefficiencies that arise when negotiation between two parties takes place in the presence of transaction costs. First, for some values of these costs it is efficient to reach an agreement but the unique equilibrium outcome is one in which agreement is never reached. Secondly, even when there are equilibria in which an agreement is reached, we find that the model always has an equilibrium in which agreement is never reached, as well as equilibria in which agreement is delayed for an arbitrary length of time.
Finally, the only way in which the parties can reach an agreement in equilibrium is by using inefficient punishments for (some of) the opponent's deviations. We argue that this implies that, when the parties are given the opportunity to renegotiate out of these inefficiencies, the only equilibrium outcome which survives is the one in which agreement is never reached, regardless of the value of the transaction costs.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33145
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33145
PURE UUID: d67d0636-a2ea-434a-bb91-c821f58edc35
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:19
Export record
Contributors
Author:
L. Anderlini
Author:
L. Felli
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics