The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Portfolio analysis in European merger control: an economic analysis

Portfolio analysis in European merger control: an economic analysis
Portfolio analysis in European merger control: an economic analysis
The year 1997 saw the emergence of a new game theory in European merger control called the 'portfolio power theory'. The European Commission argues that the holder of a comprehensive portfolio of brands may obtain a stronger position vis-à-vis its customers, and can therefore more easily impose restrictions, such as full-line forcing. The objective of this paper is to analyse this argument from a theoretical point of view. We show that tie-in sales allow the incumbent to deter entry and to eliminate the retailer's rent when the downstream sector is monopolised. When the producers compete directly for consumers, the second brand provides a new predation tool. This allows the incumbent to deter entry more easily, but it can also limit price distortion. In both cases, the welfare impact is not clear-cut.
Vergé, Thibaud
d4cfb087-7fd2-4612-8ebf-7057dc381d2e
Vergé, Thibaud
d4cfb087-7fd2-4612-8ebf-7057dc381d2e

Vergé, Thibaud (2002) Portfolio analysis in European merger control: an economic analysis. CMPO Working Paper, (02/046).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The year 1997 saw the emergence of a new game theory in European merger control called the 'portfolio power theory'. The European Commission argues that the holder of a comprehensive portfolio of brands may obtain a stronger position vis-à-vis its customers, and can therefore more easily impose restrictions, such as full-line forcing. The objective of this paper is to analyse this argument from a theoretical point of view. We show that tie-in sales allow the incumbent to deter entry and to eliminate the retailer's rent when the downstream sector is monopolised. When the producers compete directly for consumers, the second brand provides a new predation tool. This allows the incumbent to deter entry more easily, but it can also limit price distortion. In both cases, the welfare impact is not clear-cut.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 33364
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33364
PURE UUID: 79a71c04-3e6f-423b-ade1-2b440c99b83e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:20

Export record

Contributors

Author: Thibaud Vergé

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×