Conditional inference for possibly unidentified structural equations
Conditional inference for possibly unidentified structural equations
The possibility that a structural equation may not be identified casts doubt on measures of estimator precision that are usually used. Using the Fieller–Creasy problem for illustration, we argue that an observed identifiability test statistic is directly relevant to the precision with which the structural parameters can be estimated, and hence we argue that inference in such models should be conditioned on the observed value of that statistic (or statistics).
We examine in detail the effects of such conditioning on the properties of the ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (TSLS) estimators for the coefficients of the endogenous variables in a single structural equation. We show that (a) conditioning has very little impact on the properties of the OLS estimator but a substantial impact on those of the TSLS estimator; (b) the conditional variance of the TSLS estimator can be very much larger than its unconditional variance (when the identifiability statistic is small) or very much smaller (when the identifiability statistic is large); and (c) conditional mean-square-error comparisons of the two estimators favor the OLS estimator when the sample evidence only weakly supports the identifiability hypothesis but favor TSLS when that evidence moderately supports identifiability.
Finally, we note that another consequence of our argument is that the statistic upon which Anderson–Rubin confidence sets are based is in fact nonpivotal.
707-743
Forchini, Giovanni
e5ed4ef7-02d1-491d-8105-c9e36baa2ad6
Hillier, Grant
3423bd61-c35f-497e-87a3-6a5fca73a2a1
2003
Forchini, Giovanni
e5ed4ef7-02d1-491d-8105-c9e36baa2ad6
Hillier, Grant
3423bd61-c35f-497e-87a3-6a5fca73a2a1
Forchini, Giovanni and Hillier, Grant
(2003)
Conditional inference for possibly unidentified structural equations.
Econometric Theory, 19 (5), .
(doi:10.1017/S0266466603195011).
Abstract
The possibility that a structural equation may not be identified casts doubt on measures of estimator precision that are usually used. Using the Fieller–Creasy problem for illustration, we argue that an observed identifiability test statistic is directly relevant to the precision with which the structural parameters can be estimated, and hence we argue that inference in such models should be conditioned on the observed value of that statistic (or statistics).
We examine in detail the effects of such conditioning on the properties of the ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (TSLS) estimators for the coefficients of the endogenous variables in a single structural equation. We show that (a) conditioning has very little impact on the properties of the OLS estimator but a substantial impact on those of the TSLS estimator; (b) the conditional variance of the TSLS estimator can be very much larger than its unconditional variance (when the identifiability statistic is small) or very much smaller (when the identifiability statistic is large); and (c) conditional mean-square-error comparisons of the two estimators favor the OLS estimator when the sample evidence only weakly supports the identifiability hypothesis but favor TSLS when that evidence moderately supports identifiability.
Finally, we note that another consequence of our argument is that the statistic upon which Anderson–Rubin confidence sets are based is in fact nonpivotal.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33409
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33409
PURE UUID: f029a369-73b9-4649-b3e1-910f56741b7b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Giovanni Forchini
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics