The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing

Bowling, Ann and Iliffe, Steve (2006) Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing Age and Ageing, 35, (6), pp. 607-614. (doi:10.1093/ageing/afl100).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: there is increasing interest in how to age ‘successfully’ and in reaching consensus over its definition.

Objective: to assess different models of successful ageing, using a British longitudinal survey of ageing in 2000–1.

Setting: community settings in Britain.

Methods: five models of successful ageing were tested on a British cross-sectional population survey of 999 people aged 65+. The models were biomedical, broader biomedical, social, psychological and lay based.

Results: the lay model emerged as the strongest. Respondents who were classified as successfully aged with this model, compared with those not successfully aged, had over five times the odds of rating their quality of life (QoL) as good rather than not good [odds ratio (OR) = 5.493, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 2.655–11.364].

Conclusion: the lay-based, more multidimensional, model of successful ageing predicted perceived QoL more powerfully than unidimensional models and should be used to evaluate the outcomes of health promotion in older populations.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: November 2006
Keywords: successful ageing, physical functioning, mental functioning, social functioning, health status, well-being, quality of life, elderly
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 334584
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/334584
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: a722819f-7e3c-4bee-9fd7-0e9e5d68fe77

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2012 14:26
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 06:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ann Bowling
Author: Steve Iliffe

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×