The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups

Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups
Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups
Belbin’s Team-Role Theory is extensively used as a counselling and team development tool by organisations and management consultancies in the UK. However, there is little empirical support for his work, largely because there has been scant research. This study sought to redress this situation by testing Belbin’s proposal that teams in which a wide range of team-roles are represented perform better than those where there is an imbalance of roles because certain roles are over-represented. The task performance of six teams of four individuals identified as shapers by the Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory (Belbin, 1981), was compared with that of six mixed teams of four individuals; one co-ordinator, one plant, one completer finisher, and one team worker. It was found that consistent with Belbin’s proposal the “mixed” teams performed better than teams consisting of shapers alone. Some possible explanations and implications of the findings are discussed
organizational development, team building, teamwork
0262-1711
652-665
Prichard, Jane S.
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Stanton, Neville
d681536b-b50f-4e6b-9ac0-2b07ebfd7d38
Prichard, Jane S.
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Stanton, Neville
d681536b-b50f-4e6b-9ac0-2b07ebfd7d38

Prichard, Jane S. and Stanton, Neville (1999) Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups. Journal of Management Development, 18 (8), 652-665. (doi:10.1108/02621719910371164).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Belbin’s Team-Role Theory is extensively used as a counselling and team development tool by organisations and management consultancies in the UK. However, there is little empirical support for his work, largely because there has been scant research. This study sought to redress this situation by testing Belbin’s proposal that teams in which a wide range of team-roles are represented perform better than those where there is an imbalance of roles because certain roles are over-represented. The task performance of six teams of four individuals identified as shapers by the Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory (Belbin, 1981), was compared with that of six mixed teams of four individuals; one co-ordinator, one plant, one completer finisher, and one team worker. It was found that consistent with Belbin’s proposal the “mixed” teams performed better than teams consisting of shapers alone. Some possible explanations and implications of the findings are discussed

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1999
Keywords: organizational development, team building, teamwork

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 33474
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33474
ISSN: 0262-1711
PURE UUID: 503cebfa-fcdb-4458-86c8-16fe360ee7ef
ORCID for Jane S. Prichard: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-2244

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Neville Stanton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×