Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups
Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups
Belbin’s Team-Role Theory is extensively used as a counselling and team development tool by organisations and management consultancies in the UK. However, there is little empirical support for his work, largely because there has been scant research. This study sought to redress this situation by testing Belbin’s proposal that teams in which a wide range of team-roles are represented perform better than those where there is an imbalance of roles because certain roles are over-represented. The task performance of six teams of four individuals identified as shapers by the Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory (Belbin, 1981), was compared with that of six mixed teams of four individuals; one co-ordinator, one plant, one completer finisher, and one team worker. It was found that consistent with Belbin’s proposal the “mixed” teams performed better than teams consisting of shapers alone. Some possible explanations and implications of the findings are discussed
organizational development, team building, teamwork
652-665
Prichard, Jane S.
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Stanton, Neville
d681536b-b50f-4e6b-9ac0-2b07ebfd7d38
1999
Prichard, Jane S.
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
Stanton, Neville
d681536b-b50f-4e6b-9ac0-2b07ebfd7d38
Prichard, Jane S. and Stanton, Neville
(1999)
Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups.
Journal of Management Development, 18 (8), .
(doi:10.1108/02621719910371164).
Abstract
Belbin’s Team-Role Theory is extensively used as a counselling and team development tool by organisations and management consultancies in the UK. However, there is little empirical support for his work, largely because there has been scant research. This study sought to redress this situation by testing Belbin’s proposal that teams in which a wide range of team-roles are represented perform better than those where there is an imbalance of roles because certain roles are over-represented. The task performance of six teams of four individuals identified as shapers by the Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory (Belbin, 1981), was compared with that of six mixed teams of four individuals; one co-ordinator, one plant, one completer finisher, and one team worker. It was found that consistent with Belbin’s proposal the “mixed” teams performed better than teams consisting of shapers alone. Some possible explanations and implications of the findings are discussed
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1999
Keywords:
organizational development, team building, teamwork
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33474
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33474
ISSN: 0262-1711
PURE UUID: 503cebfa-fcdb-4458-86c8-16fe360ee7ef
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Neville Stanton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics