The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women

Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women
Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women
Objective: To assess the feasibility of collecting disease-specific and generic data on the impact of surgery on the social lives of women with stress incontinence; to describe the social impact of surgery in a representative group; and to determine the effect of timing on the assessment of outcome.

Design Longitudinal study: questionnaires before and three, six, and twelve months after surgery.

Setting: Eighteen hospitals in North Thames region.

Participants: Four hundred and forty-two women undergoing surgery for stress incontinence between January 1993 and June 1994.

Main outcome measures: Post-operative recovery time, stress incontinence symptom impact index, activities of daily living, and cost of protection.

Results: Post-operative recovery was uneventful for most women, but three months after surgery 24% of those in paid employment beforehand were still on sick or unpaid leave. Most women (75%) reported that stress incontinence had less adverse impact on their lives three months after surgery, though 18% reported no change, and 7% felt life was worse. The likelihood of improvement was similar regardless of whether pre-operative urodynamic studies had been conducted. The extent of improvement was dependent on pre-operative severity. Similar findings were obtained six and twelve months after surgery. After an initial slight but nonsignificant deterioration in their ability to carry out activities of daily living, women gained a slight benefit from surgery (proportion with no or only slight limitation rose from 72% to 82%; P= 0.0001). The mean cost of protection (pads and towels) fell from £8.59 a month before surgery to £2.99 a month one year after surgery, by which time 68% of women were not using protection. In contrast, 11% were still spending over £10 a month.

Conclusions: It is possible to collect standard data on the impact of surgery on social functioning and, thus, provide women with better information on likely outcomes. The benefits of pre-operative urodynamic investigations need to be assessed. The stability of the outcome measures over the first post-operative year suggest that outcomes need to be assessed only once and at any time from three to twelve months after the operation.
stress incontinence, surgery, quality of life
0306-5456
605 - 612
Black, N.A.
26f32d60-1364-483e-a683-d7bdabae277e
Bowling, A.
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Griffiths, J.M.
e328f800-7b54-48ff-af29-fe2325c2def7
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Abel, P.D.
8f304417-2c10-4d94-97a3-9ff32ca002cc
Black, N.A.
26f32d60-1364-483e-a683-d7bdabae277e
Bowling, A.
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Griffiths, J.M.
e328f800-7b54-48ff-af29-fe2325c2def7
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Abel, P.D.
8f304417-2c10-4d94-97a3-9ff32ca002cc

Black, N.A., Bowling, A., Griffiths, J.M., Pope, C. and Abel, P.D. (1998) Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the social lives of women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105 (6), 605 - 612. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10174.x). (PMID:9647150)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of collecting disease-specific and generic data on the impact of surgery on the social lives of women with stress incontinence; to describe the social impact of surgery in a representative group; and to determine the effect of timing on the assessment of outcome.

Design Longitudinal study: questionnaires before and three, six, and twelve months after surgery.

Setting: Eighteen hospitals in North Thames region.

Participants: Four hundred and forty-two women undergoing surgery for stress incontinence between January 1993 and June 1994.

Main outcome measures: Post-operative recovery time, stress incontinence symptom impact index, activities of daily living, and cost of protection.

Results: Post-operative recovery was uneventful for most women, but three months after surgery 24% of those in paid employment beforehand were still on sick or unpaid leave. Most women (75%) reported that stress incontinence had less adverse impact on their lives three months after surgery, though 18% reported no change, and 7% felt life was worse. The likelihood of improvement was similar regardless of whether pre-operative urodynamic studies had been conducted. The extent of improvement was dependent on pre-operative severity. Similar findings were obtained six and twelve months after surgery. After an initial slight but nonsignificant deterioration in their ability to carry out activities of daily living, women gained a slight benefit from surgery (proportion with no or only slight limitation rose from 72% to 82%; P= 0.0001). The mean cost of protection (pads and towels) fell from £8.59 a month before surgery to £2.99 a month one year after surgery, by which time 68% of women were not using protection. In contrast, 11% were still spending over £10 a month.

Conclusions: It is possible to collect standard data on the impact of surgery on social functioning and, thus, provide women with better information on likely outcomes. The benefits of pre-operative urodynamic investigations need to be assessed. The stability of the outcome measures over the first post-operative year suggest that outcomes need to be assessed only once and at any time from three to twelve months after the operation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 1998
Keywords: stress incontinence, surgery, quality of life
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 334746
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/334746
ISSN: 0306-5456
PURE UUID: a716b2e1-b91f-42e3-a781-9095c5eb6d1f
ORCID for C. Pope: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Mar 2012 11:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N.A. Black
Author: A. Bowling
Author: J.M. Griffiths
Author: C. Pope ORCID iD
Author: P.D. Abel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×