The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling

What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling
What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling
The purpose of this study was to identify the determinants of choice of surgical procedure (anterior colporrhaphy, colposuspension, or needle suspension) to treat stress incontinence in women. We used multilevel modeling of data on 271 patients in 18 hospitals in England in 1993-94. Patient-related factors included sociodemographic details, anatomical diagnosis, symptom severity, symptom impact, previous treatment, parity, comorbidity, and general health status. Surgeon-related factors were specialty, grade, and annual volume of procedures undertaken. Hospital teaching status was considered. Some patient-related factors were associated with choice of procedure: women with a concomitant genital prolapse, with a history of high parity, and with no previous nonsurgical treatment were more likely to undergo an anterior colporrhaphy than a colposuspension or needle suspension (although this finding could be confounded by surgical specialty). In addition, women were more likely to be treated by colposuspension if their surgeon specialized in incontinence surgery (measured by annual volume of cases). Finally, being treated by needle suspension depended on there being a consultant surgeon familiar with the procedure at the hospital attended. While choice of surgical procedure depends partly on the patient's anatomical diagnosis, it is also dependent on the specialty of the surgeon whom she consults and the hospital that she attends. This variability, in turn, could have implications for the patient (as the relative effectiveness of the different procedures is unknown) and for the purchasers of care (as the relative cost-effectiveness of procedures is also unknown).
urinary incontinence, stress incontinence, surgery
0266-4623
431 - 445
Griffiths, Joanne M.
c9c55e6f-8e61-41f7-b02c-a11b01858cbe
Black, Nicholas A.
c647c08d-acab-465c-bac5-7a2edd906ee7
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Stanley, Jenny
6e024931-692a-4521-80ce-db7682a0dff3
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Abel, Paul D.
1b6bc641-c505-41d4-bb7c-bd51ede7e597
Griffiths, Joanne M.
c9c55e6f-8e61-41f7-b02c-a11b01858cbe
Black, Nicholas A.
c647c08d-acab-465c-bac5-7a2edd906ee7
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Stanley, Jenny
6e024931-692a-4521-80ce-db7682a0dff3
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Abel, Paul D.
1b6bc641-c505-41d4-bb7c-bd51ede7e597

Griffiths, Joanne M., Black, Nicholas A., Pope, Catherine, Stanley, Jenny, Bowling, Ann and Abel, Paul D. (1998) What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 14 (3), Summer Issue, 431 - 445. (doi:10.1017/S0266462300011417). (PMID:9780530)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the determinants of choice of surgical procedure (anterior colporrhaphy, colposuspension, or needle suspension) to treat stress incontinence in women. We used multilevel modeling of data on 271 patients in 18 hospitals in England in 1993-94. Patient-related factors included sociodemographic details, anatomical diagnosis, symptom severity, symptom impact, previous treatment, parity, comorbidity, and general health status. Surgeon-related factors were specialty, grade, and annual volume of procedures undertaken. Hospital teaching status was considered. Some patient-related factors were associated with choice of procedure: women with a concomitant genital prolapse, with a history of high parity, and with no previous nonsurgical treatment were more likely to undergo an anterior colporrhaphy than a colposuspension or needle suspension (although this finding could be confounded by surgical specialty). In addition, women were more likely to be treated by colposuspension if their surgeon specialized in incontinence surgery (measured by annual volume of cases). Finally, being treated by needle suspension depended on there being a consultant surgeon familiar with the procedure at the hospital attended. While choice of surgical procedure depends partly on the patient's anatomical diagnosis, it is also dependent on the specialty of the surgeon whom she consults and the hospital that she attends. This variability, in turn, could have implications for the patient (as the relative effectiveness of the different procedures is unknown) and for the purchasers of care (as the relative cost-effectiveness of procedures is also unknown).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1998
Keywords: urinary incontinence, stress incontinence, surgery
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 334758
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/334758
ISSN: 0266-4623
PURE UUID: 4a06e541-2580-4197-8428-fc83ef1a839c
ORCID for Catherine Pope: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Mar 2012 11:12
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joanne M. Griffiths
Author: Nicholas A. Black
Author: Catherine Pope ORCID iD
Author: Jenny Stanley
Author: Ann Bowling
Author: Paul D. Abel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×