Stable international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant, uncertainty and learning
Stable international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant, uncertainty and learning
In this paper I address the question of how uncertainty about damage costs and the possibility of resolving that uncertainty in the future affects the incentives for countries to join an international environmental agreement. I use a two-period model with a stock pollutant where the number of countries generating pollution can be arbitrarily large. The stability concept employed is such that size of the stable IEA can be anywhere between 2 and the grand coalition of all countries depending on parameter values. The dynamic structure allows two different membership rules for an IEA: fixed (countries commit at the outset to be members for both periods) or variable (countries decide each period whether to join). I show that with fixed membership learning results in at least as high membership and global welfare as no learning (unless both the expected value and variance of damage costs are high). With variable membership, learning leads to higher membership (in the second period) but lower global welfare than no learning. For most parameter values variable membership results in higher global welfare than fixed membership.
international environmental agreements, uncertainty, learning, fixed membership, variable membership, self-enforcing agreements
53-73
Ulph, Alistair
82a2f3b8-ac72-4d0e-85cc-2760eb99b117
2004
Ulph, Alistair
82a2f3b8-ac72-4d0e-85cc-2760eb99b117
Ulph, Alistair
(2004)
Stable international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant, uncertainty and learning.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29 (1), .
(doi:10.1023/B:RISK.0000031445.13939.e4).
Abstract
In this paper I address the question of how uncertainty about damage costs and the possibility of resolving that uncertainty in the future affects the incentives for countries to join an international environmental agreement. I use a two-period model with a stock pollutant where the number of countries generating pollution can be arbitrarily large. The stability concept employed is such that size of the stable IEA can be anywhere between 2 and the grand coalition of all countries depending on parameter values. The dynamic structure allows two different membership rules for an IEA: fixed (countries commit at the outset to be members for both periods) or variable (countries decide each period whether to join). I show that with fixed membership learning results in at least as high membership and global welfare as no learning (unless both the expected value and variance of damage costs are high). With variable membership, learning leads to higher membership (in the second period) but lower global welfare than no learning. For most parameter values variable membership results in higher global welfare than fixed membership.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Keywords:
international environmental agreements, uncertainty, learning, fixed membership, variable membership, self-enforcing agreements
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33486
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33486
ISSN: 0895-5646
PURE UUID: 20bd03a0-c33d-4bf1-b65f-7421d29df978
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alistair Ulph
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics