Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses
The cognitive processes and decision-making strategies of eyewitnesses were tested for their predictive qualities in determining the accuracy of identifications from lineups. The sequential lineup presentation was compared with the traditionally employed simultaneous lineup under culprit (target) present and culprit absent conditions. Consistent with previous research the sequential presentation resulted in an equivalent number of correct identifications compared to the simultaneous lineup but reduced false identification rates. Although sequential lineups were found to be associated with the use of absolute strategies, those shown a simultaneous lineup reported the use of both relative and absolute strategies. Accurate identifications and rejections were found to be associated with the use of absolute strategies, irrespective of lineup presentation or presence of target. Also accurate identifications, at least with a sequential lineup, were generally made faster than inaccurate identifications. These results are compared to previous studies with respect to the effect that mode of processing (relative versus absolute judgements) has on a witness's decision making and identification accuracy.
659-671
Kneller, Wendy
52a8425c-bda2-4672-b2df-69adf05bbdcb
Memon, Amina
0f2c0227-1087-4914-825a-800c401a6d96
Stevenage, Sarah
493f8c57-9af9-4783-b189-e06b8e958460
2001
Kneller, Wendy
52a8425c-bda2-4672-b2df-69adf05bbdcb
Memon, Amina
0f2c0227-1087-4914-825a-800c401a6d96
Stevenage, Sarah
493f8c57-9af9-4783-b189-e06b8e958460
Kneller, Wendy, Memon, Amina and Stevenage, Sarah
(2001)
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15 (6), .
(doi:10.1002/acp.739).
Abstract
The cognitive processes and decision-making strategies of eyewitnesses were tested for their predictive qualities in determining the accuracy of identifications from lineups. The sequential lineup presentation was compared with the traditionally employed simultaneous lineup under culprit (target) present and culprit absent conditions. Consistent with previous research the sequential presentation resulted in an equivalent number of correct identifications compared to the simultaneous lineup but reduced false identification rates. Although sequential lineups were found to be associated with the use of absolute strategies, those shown a simultaneous lineup reported the use of both relative and absolute strategies. Accurate identifications and rejections were found to be associated with the use of absolute strategies, irrespective of lineup presentation or presence of target. Also accurate identifications, at least with a sequential lineup, were generally made faster than inaccurate identifications. These results are compared to previous studies with respect to the effect that mode of processing (relative versus absolute judgements) has on a witness's decision making and identification accuracy.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33509
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33509
ISSN: 0888-4080
PURE UUID: d6a311f1-29a5-460e-ace8-739e59c10eab
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Wendy Kneller
Author:
Amina Memon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics