The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom

Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom
Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom
Background. Socioeconomic disparities and their contribution to the ethnic differences in living kidney donor transplantation have not been adequately studied.

Methods. A total of 12,282 patients aged 18 to 69 years starting renal replacement therapy (January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2004) in the United Kingdom were included. Logistic regression models were used to examine probability of living donor transplantation within 3 years of renal replacement therapy. The effect of area deprivation (Townsend index) was studied among whites only adjusted for patient characteristics and the effect of ethnic origin (South Asians and blacks compared with whites) was then examined among all patients adjusting for area deprivation.

Results. Among whites, increasing social deprivation was associated with lower odds of living donor transplantation. In the fully adjusted model, odds ratio (OR) for the most deprived quintile was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33, 0.49; P trend<0.0001) compared with the least deprived. These gradients were more pronounced among centers performing more live donor transplants (P value for interaction <0.0001). South Asians and blacks had lower odds of living donor transplantation compared with whites, but there was an interaction with age (P<0.0001), so that this disparity was observed only in those younger than 50 years (blacks: OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18, 0.54; South Asians: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.90; P value <0.0001).

Conclusions. Socially deprived and younger ethnic minority patients have lower probability of living kidney donor transplantation. The extent to which these inequalities reflect modifiable societal healthcare system barriers and donor/recipient factors requires further study.
0041-1337
610-616
Udayaraj, Udaya
2b7e852d-3cd7-44a1-b07d-7a80484b455c
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Casula, Anna
ff820737-c91d-4434-845e-5685da2307f5
Dudley, Chris
7473541f-9eb8-4ed5-9ab6-cdc169f74370
Collett, Dave
7f065fd3-e3b3-487e-9e34-f48490884148
Ansell, David
9c009488-5612-4d05-9389-15dd3e238a7c
Tomson, Charles
d9044890-5faf-4d0c-b685-5cfa41929c44
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29
Udayaraj, Udaya
2b7e852d-3cd7-44a1-b07d-7a80484b455c
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Casula, Anna
ff820737-c91d-4434-845e-5685da2307f5
Dudley, Chris
7473541f-9eb8-4ed5-9ab6-cdc169f74370
Collett, Dave
7f065fd3-e3b3-487e-9e34-f48490884148
Ansell, David
9c009488-5612-4d05-9389-15dd3e238a7c
Tomson, Charles
d9044890-5faf-4d0c-b685-5cfa41929c44
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29

Udayaraj, Udaya, Ben-Shlomo, Yoav, Roderick, Paul, Casula, Anna, Dudley, Chris, Collett, Dave, Ansell, David, Tomson, Charles and Caskey, Fergus (2012) Social deprivation, ethnicity, and uptake of living kidney donor transplantation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation, 93 (6), 610-616. (doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e318245593f). (PMID:22245879)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Socioeconomic disparities and their contribution to the ethnic differences in living kidney donor transplantation have not been adequately studied.

Methods. A total of 12,282 patients aged 18 to 69 years starting renal replacement therapy (January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2004) in the United Kingdom were included. Logistic regression models were used to examine probability of living donor transplantation within 3 years of renal replacement therapy. The effect of area deprivation (Townsend index) was studied among whites only adjusted for patient characteristics and the effect of ethnic origin (South Asians and blacks compared with whites) was then examined among all patients adjusting for area deprivation.

Results. Among whites, increasing social deprivation was associated with lower odds of living donor transplantation. In the fully adjusted model, odds ratio (OR) for the most deprived quintile was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33, 0.49; P trend<0.0001) compared with the least deprived. These gradients were more pronounced among centers performing more live donor transplants (P value for interaction <0.0001). South Asians and blacks had lower odds of living donor transplantation compared with whites, but there was an interaction with age (P<0.0001), so that this disparity was observed only in those younger than 50 years (blacks: OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18, 0.54; South Asians: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34, 0.90; P value <0.0001).

Conclusions. Socially deprived and younger ethnic minority patients have lower probability of living kidney donor transplantation. The extent to which these inequalities reflect modifiable societal healthcare system barriers and donor/recipient factors requires further study.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 March 2012
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 335550
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/335550
ISSN: 0041-1337
PURE UUID: a439998d-1179-4e6a-8892-98e024d2bc6f
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Mar 2012 15:13
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Udaya Udayaraj
Author: Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Anna Casula
Author: Chris Dudley
Author: Dave Collett
Author: David Ansell
Author: Charles Tomson
Author: Fergus Caskey

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×