The effects of organizational context and teamworking activities on performance outcomes
The effects of organizational context and teamworking activities on performance outcomes
This article seeks to evaluate the effects of organizational context and teamworking activities on the performance outcomes of public sector workers. Ability, Motivation and Opportunity (AMO) theory is used as the basis of this study in which it is predicted that employees’ ability, motivation and opportunities to participate will affect organizational performance. Procter and Mueller’s (2000) framework is used to identify relevant HR contextual features, namely discretionary rewards, appraisal, training and development, industrial relations and organizational culture. Data based on the 2003 Local Government Workplace Survey (N¼3,165) were used to test six research hypotheses and related subhypotheses. The findings show that individually, the effects of organizational context and teamworking activities were as hypothesized and consistent with AMO theory. However, the interaction effects were far less pronounced in that they were either nonsignificant or negative, with the exception of the interaction term teamworking X appraisal, which positively predicted organizational commitment. However, the teamworking X appraisal interaction also led to increased stress, something we consider to be a ‘sting in the tail’ for workers. Thus we argue that even though the interaction effects of teamworking and organizational context are minimal, the individual effects contribute to enhanced worker attitudes and perceived organizational performance
759-787
Gould-Williams, Julian Seymour
a7636876-da14-4191-90ec-e79ac492e67f
Gatenby, Mark
9dc95cde-11ee-49fa-a380-1fd6b3e5aa39
2010
Gould-Williams, Julian Seymour
a7636876-da14-4191-90ec-e79ac492e67f
Gatenby, Mark
9dc95cde-11ee-49fa-a380-1fd6b3e5aa39
Gould-Williams, Julian Seymour and Gatenby, Mark
(2010)
The effects of organizational context and teamworking activities on performance outcomes.
Public Management Review, 12 (6), .
(doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.488862).
Abstract
This article seeks to evaluate the effects of organizational context and teamworking activities on the performance outcomes of public sector workers. Ability, Motivation and Opportunity (AMO) theory is used as the basis of this study in which it is predicted that employees’ ability, motivation and opportunities to participate will affect organizational performance. Procter and Mueller’s (2000) framework is used to identify relevant HR contextual features, namely discretionary rewards, appraisal, training and development, industrial relations and organizational culture. Data based on the 2003 Local Government Workplace Survey (N¼3,165) were used to test six research hypotheses and related subhypotheses. The findings show that individually, the effects of organizational context and teamworking activities were as hypothesized and consistent with AMO theory. However, the interaction effects were far less pronounced in that they were either nonsignificant or negative, with the exception of the interaction term teamworking X appraisal, which positively predicted organizational commitment. However, the teamworking X appraisal interaction also led to increased stress, something we consider to be a ‘sting in the tail’ for workers. Thus we argue that even though the interaction effects of teamworking and organizational context are minimal, the individual effects contribute to enhanced worker attitudes and perceived organizational performance
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 October 2010
Published date: 2010
Organisations:
Southampton Business School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 336286
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336286
ISSN: 1471-9037
PURE UUID: ff44520b-c169-42f7-ac55-d917a2ca0479
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Mar 2012 08:38
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Julian Seymour Gould-Williams
Author:
Mark Gatenby
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics