Governing mega-events: tools of security risk management for the London 2012 Olympic Games and FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany
Governing mega-events: tools of security risk management for the London 2012 Olympic Games and FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany
Mega-events present a special venue for the practice of risk management. This article analyses the management of security risks in the case of two sporting mega-events, the London 2012 Olympic Games and the FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany. To what extent do strategies and practices of risk management resemble each other across events? And what explains similarities or differences in the tools of risk management observed in each of these cases? First, this article explores three theoretical explanations for the choice of particular policy tools or instruments. Second, it introduces the tools of government approach as a means of conducting a direct comparative analysis of risk management across political and organizational settings and over time. The tools used for security risk management at the two mega-events are then compared and the different logics of tool choice are evaluated. This analytical approach offers a basis for future comparative inquiry into tools of risk management used in public and private organizations. The empirical findings highlight the particular importance of national political systems in influencing tool choice.
192-222
Jennings, Will
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Lodge, Martin
ccca8f20-f037-4302-aa5e-4e9b1e8f4018
April 2011
Jennings, Will
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Lodge, Martin
ccca8f20-f037-4302-aa5e-4e9b1e8f4018
Jennings, Will and Lodge, Martin
(2011)
Governing mega-events: tools of security risk management for the London 2012 Olympic Games and FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany.
Government and Opposition, 46 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01336.x).
Abstract
Mega-events present a special venue for the practice of risk management. This article analyses the management of security risks in the case of two sporting mega-events, the London 2012 Olympic Games and the FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany. To what extent do strategies and practices of risk management resemble each other across events? And what explains similarities or differences in the tools of risk management observed in each of these cases? First, this article explores three theoretical explanations for the choice of particular policy tools or instruments. Second, it introduces the tools of government approach as a means of conducting a direct comparative analysis of risk management across political and organizational settings and over time. The tools used for security risk management at the two mega-events are then compared and the different logics of tool choice are evaluated. This analytical approach offers a basis for future comparative inquiry into tools of risk management used in public and private organizations. The empirical findings highlight the particular importance of national political systems in influencing tool choice.
Text
JenningsLodgeGOPostprint.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2011
Published date: April 2011
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 336590
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336590
ISSN: 0017-257X
PURE UUID: 98a8b518-de87-4271-82d6-c9febae9513d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Mar 2012 10:13
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Martin Lodge
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics