Ovarian and cervical cancer awareness: development of two validated measurement tools
Ovarian and cervical cancer awareness: development of two validated measurement tools
Background The aim of the study was to develop and validate measures of awareness of symptoms and risk factors for ovarian and cervical cancer (Ovarian and Cervical Cancer Awareness Measures).
Methods Potentially relevant items were extracted from the literature and generated by experts. Four validation studies were carried out to establish reliability and validity. Women aged 21–67 years (n=146) and ovarian and cervical cancer experts (n=32) were included in the studies. Internal reliability was assessed psychometrically. Test-retest reliability was assessed over a 1-week interval. To establish construct validity, Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) scores of cancer experts were compared with equally well-educated comparison groups. Sensitivity to change was tested by randomly assigning participants to read either a leaflet giving information about ovarian/cervical cancer or a leaflet with control information, and then completing the ovarian/cervical CAM.
Results Internal reliability (Cronbach's ?=0.88 for the ovarian CAM and ?=0.84 for the cervical CAM) and test-retest reliability (r=0.84 and r=0.77 for the ovarian and cervical CAMs, respectively) were both high. Validity was demonstrated with cancer experts achieving higher scores than controls [ovarian CAM: t(36)= –5.6, p<0.001; cervical CAM: t(38)= –3.7, p=0.001], and volunteers who were randomised to read a cancer leaflet scored higher than those who received a control leaflet [ovarian CAM: t(49)=7.5, p<0.001; cervical CAM: t(48)= –5.5, p<0.001].
Conclusions This study demonstrates the psychometric properties of the ovarian and cervical CAMs and supports their utility in assessing ovarian and cervical cancer awareness in the general population.
Simon, Alice E.
10048845-5e24-43a2-b690-538f48f23f2d
Wardle, Jane
6b994195-e431-4d09-adcb-fd37cb2102a1
Grimmett, Chloe
7f27e85b-2850-481d-a7dd-2835e1a925cd
Power, Emily
2388116a-53a5-44bf-8a83-ae256a229139
Corker, Elizabeth
1d4bf36d-6158-4c23-8073-8b341b76a27a
Menson, Usha
e9997971-9d65-48a9-9acd-404164d9ec6d
Matheson, Lauren
4e548e54-983a-4c9e-ae99-22423ffeb69c
Waller, Jo
3f234f1d-7488-448f-8c24-2829093a3854
Simon, Alice E.
10048845-5e24-43a2-b690-538f48f23f2d
Wardle, Jane
6b994195-e431-4d09-adcb-fd37cb2102a1
Grimmett, Chloe
7f27e85b-2850-481d-a7dd-2835e1a925cd
Power, Emily
2388116a-53a5-44bf-8a83-ae256a229139
Corker, Elizabeth
1d4bf36d-6158-4c23-8073-8b341b76a27a
Menson, Usha
e9997971-9d65-48a9-9acd-404164d9ec6d
Matheson, Lauren
4e548e54-983a-4c9e-ae99-22423ffeb69c
Waller, Jo
3f234f1d-7488-448f-8c24-2829093a3854
Simon, Alice E., Wardle, Jane, Grimmett, Chloe, Power, Emily, Corker, Elizabeth, Menson, Usha, Matheson, Lauren and Waller, Jo
(2011)
Ovarian and cervical cancer awareness: development of two validated measurement tools.
Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care.
(doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100118).
(PMID:21933805)
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to develop and validate measures of awareness of symptoms and risk factors for ovarian and cervical cancer (Ovarian and Cervical Cancer Awareness Measures).
Methods Potentially relevant items were extracted from the literature and generated by experts. Four validation studies were carried out to establish reliability and validity. Women aged 21–67 years (n=146) and ovarian and cervical cancer experts (n=32) were included in the studies. Internal reliability was assessed psychometrically. Test-retest reliability was assessed over a 1-week interval. To establish construct validity, Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) scores of cancer experts were compared with equally well-educated comparison groups. Sensitivity to change was tested by randomly assigning participants to read either a leaflet giving information about ovarian/cervical cancer or a leaflet with control information, and then completing the ovarian/cervical CAM.
Results Internal reliability (Cronbach's ?=0.88 for the ovarian CAM and ?=0.84 for the cervical CAM) and test-retest reliability (r=0.84 and r=0.77 for the ovarian and cervical CAMs, respectively) were both high. Validity was demonstrated with cancer experts achieving higher scores than controls [ovarian CAM: t(36)= –5.6, p<0.001; cervical CAM: t(38)= –3.7, p=0.001], and volunteers who were randomised to read a cancer leaflet scored higher than those who received a control leaflet [ovarian CAM: t(49)=7.5, p<0.001; cervical CAM: t(48)= –5.5, p<0.001].
Conclusions This study demonstrates the psychometric properties of the ovarian and cervical CAMs and supports their utility in assessing ovarian and cervical cancer awareness in the general population.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 September 2011
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 336762
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336762
ISSN: 1471-1893
PURE UUID: 2abf03f9-2618-4863-9591-ee7f0f66f82c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Apr 2012 15:42
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alice E. Simon
Author:
Jane Wardle
Author:
Emily Power
Author:
Elizabeth Corker
Author:
Usha Menson
Author:
Lauren Matheson
Author:
Jo Waller
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics