The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The politics of concepts: family and its (putative) replacements

The politics of concepts: family and its (putative) replacements
The politics of concepts: family and its (putative) replacements
The central concern of this paper is that there has been a move within British sociology to subsume (or sometimes, even replace) the concept of ‘family’ within ideas about personal life, intimacy and kinship. It calls attention to what will be lost sight of by this conceptual move: an understanding of the collective whole beyond the aggregation of individuals; the creation of lacunae that will be (partially) filled by other disciplines; and engagement with policy developments and professional practices that focus on ‘family’ as a core, institutionalised, idea. While repudiating the necessity (and indeed, pointing out the dangers) of providing any definitive answer to definitions of ‘family’, the paper calls for critical reflection on the implications of these conceptual moves.
family, family policy, family sociology, intimacy, kinship, personal life
0007-1315
730-746
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Ribbens McCarthy, Jane
a11a809a-a923-4c23-83da-f4ce7e3f4498
Gillies, Val
9c9bcf7c-be6d-4fce-bc64-4df1c1953db1
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Ribbens McCarthy, Jane
a11a809a-a923-4c23-83da-f4ce7e3f4498
Gillies, Val
9c9bcf7c-be6d-4fce-bc64-4df1c1953db1

Edwards, Rosalind, Ribbens McCarthy, Jane and Gillies, Val (2012) The politics of concepts: family and its (putative) replacements. British Journal of Sociology, 63 (4), 730-746. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01434.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The central concern of this paper is that there has been a move within British sociology to subsume (or sometimes, even replace) the concept of ‘family’ within ideas about personal life, intimacy and kinship. It calls attention to what will be lost sight of by this conceptual move: an understanding of the collective whole beyond the aggregation of individuals; the creation of lacunae that will be (partially) filled by other disciplines; and engagement with policy developments and professional practices that focus on ‘family’ as a core, institutionalised, idea. While repudiating the necessity (and indeed, pointing out the dangers) of providing any definitive answer to definitions of ‘family’, the paper calls for critical reflection on the implications of these conceptual moves.

Text
Politics_of_concepts_BJS_final.pdf - Author's Original
Download (166kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 December 2012
Published date: December 2012
Keywords: family, family policy, family sociology, intimacy, kinship, personal life
Organisations: Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 336914
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/336914
ISSN: 0007-1315
PURE UUID: c6559ee5-0d8e-4ac0-867e-1b3e52a0b1ae
ORCID for Rosalind Edwards: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-9029

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2012 13:10
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jane Ribbens McCarthy
Author: Val Gillies

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×