The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Normality and emplotment: Walter Leigh’s 'Midsummer Night’s Dream' in the Third Reich and Britain

Normality and emplotment: Walter Leigh’s 'Midsummer Night’s Dream' in the Third Reich and Britain
Normality and emplotment: Walter Leigh’s 'Midsummer Night’s Dream' in the Third Reich and Britain
This article explores current controversies in the historiography of music in Nazi Germany by focusing on the case of the English composer Walter Leigh’s acceptance in 1936 of a commission from the German pedagogue Hilmar Höckner to write incidental music for a schoolboy production of Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream. Leigh, who was killed in action in North Africa in 1942, has been criticized for taking this commission, notably by Fred K. Prieberg in his ground-breaking study of ‘replacement’ compositions for Mendelssohn’s iconic work, which had fallen into disfavour (for obvious reasons) in Nazi Germany. In this essay I attempt a detailed micro-history of this piece, beginning with Leigh and Höckner’s first meeting in the later years of the Weimar Republic and following their collaboration across the watershed of the Nazi assumption of power in 1933. I show that while neither man followed an overt political agenda, both were at some level aware of the political implications of their collaboration. Leigh, for instance, included an obvious quotation from Mendelssohn’s setting in his own, and Höckner attempted to explain the commission defending it as an experiment in good pedagogy ‘also’ made necessary by the impossibility of performing the Mendelssohn version. I also trace Höckner’s two tours of Britain (in 1938 and 1939), both of which included performances of Leigh’s Midsummer Night’s Dream music, one sponsored by the pro-German Anglo-German Fellowship. Finally, I consider both Höckner and Leigh’s own political writings: the former defended his Hindemith-inspired pedagogic approach as late as 1943, and the latter, in public and private, took a decidedly anti-pacifist position in the run-up to the outbreak of war in 1939. The essay ends with a discussion of current approaches to narrating the history of music under Nazism. I argue that influential work in the field does not consider the special ‘modes of emplotment’ (Hayden White) this history requires.
0027-4224
295-323
Irvine, Thomas
aab08974-17f8-4614-86be-e94e7b9cfe76
Irvine, Thomas
aab08974-17f8-4614-86be-e94e7b9cfe76

Irvine, Thomas (2013) Normality and emplotment: Walter Leigh’s 'Midsummer Night’s Dream' in the Third Reich and Britain. Music & Letters, 94 (2), 295-323. (doi:10.1093/ml/gct048).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article explores current controversies in the historiography of music in Nazi Germany by focusing on the case of the English composer Walter Leigh’s acceptance in 1936 of a commission from the German pedagogue Hilmar Höckner to write incidental music for a schoolboy production of Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream. Leigh, who was killed in action in North Africa in 1942, has been criticized for taking this commission, notably by Fred K. Prieberg in his ground-breaking study of ‘replacement’ compositions for Mendelssohn’s iconic work, which had fallen into disfavour (for obvious reasons) in Nazi Germany. In this essay I attempt a detailed micro-history of this piece, beginning with Leigh and Höckner’s first meeting in the later years of the Weimar Republic and following their collaboration across the watershed of the Nazi assumption of power in 1933. I show that while neither man followed an overt political agenda, both were at some level aware of the political implications of their collaboration. Leigh, for instance, included an obvious quotation from Mendelssohn’s setting in his own, and Höckner attempted to explain the commission defending it as an experiment in good pedagogy ‘also’ made necessary by the impossibility of performing the Mendelssohn version. I also trace Höckner’s two tours of Britain (in 1938 and 1939), both of which included performances of Leigh’s Midsummer Night’s Dream music, one sponsored by the pro-German Anglo-German Fellowship. Finally, I consider both Höckner and Leigh’s own political writings: the former defended his Hindemith-inspired pedagogic approach as late as 1943, and the latter, in public and private, took a decidedly anti-pacifist position in the run-up to the outbreak of war in 1939. The essay ends with a discussion of current approaches to narrating the history of music under Nazism. I argue that influential work in the field does not consider the special ‘modes of emplotment’ (Hayden White) this history requires.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 June 2013
Organisations: Music

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 337336
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/337336
ISSN: 0027-4224
PURE UUID: fdce4caa-c425-46e3-855f-9df3eae09aa7

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2012 15:50
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×