The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a web-based register

Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a web-based register
Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a web-based register
Objectives: Identifying clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for primary care from electronic databases is difficult. This study aims to identify a search filter to optimize retrieval of these to establish a register of CPRs for the Cochrane Primary Health Care field.

Study Design and Setting: Thirty primary care journals were manually searched for CPRs. This was compared with electronic search filters using alternative methodologies: (1) textword searching; (2) proximity searching; (3) inclusion terms using specific phrases and truncation; (4) exclusion terms; and (5) combinations of methodologies.

Results: We manually searched 6,344 articles, revealing 41 CPRs. Across the 45 search filters, sensitivities ranged from 12% to 98%, whereas specificities ranged from 43% to 100%. There was generally a trade-off between the sensitivity and specificity of each filter (i.e., the number of CPRs and total number of articles retrieved). Combining textword searching with the inclusion terms (using specific phrases) resulted in the highest sensitivity (98%) but lower specificity (59%) than other methods. The associated precision (2%) and accuracy (60%) were also low.

Conclusion: The novel use of combining textword searching with inclusion terms was considered the most appropriate for updating a register of primary care CPRs where sensitivity has to be optimized.
clinical prediction rules, primary care, medical information retrieval, search filters, proximity searching, evidence-based medicine
848-860
Keogh, Claire
6bcd1a15-10c9-44f5-8533-4e3b0355ce72
Wallace, Emma
5e4b339f-6d15-460a-ba4b-ba9bcf43fb24
O'Brien, Kirsty K.
f37fb7f3-541f-4f3b-954c-e66273961c8a
Murphy, Paul J.
9bfdf093-429c-45cc-b40a-e17e9e6ed20c
Teljeur, Conor
b0e899bc-f73e-47d3-99fb-c9827e921c5f
McGrath, Brid
f9b53cfb-8b43-4b33-992e-692af4ae85fa
Smith, Susan M.
07c10f2c-d7ee-4c7d-b414-c66d2001fb8f
Doherty, Niall
5ddcfbff-943a-4166-84cc-40da2a7fac50
Dimitrov, Borislav D.
366d715f-ffd9-45a1-8415-65de5488472f
Fahey, Tom
c0fd145a-af82-4c37-bce0-1c2e3e30c0f9
Keogh, Claire
6bcd1a15-10c9-44f5-8533-4e3b0355ce72
Wallace, Emma
5e4b339f-6d15-460a-ba4b-ba9bcf43fb24
O'Brien, Kirsty K.
f37fb7f3-541f-4f3b-954c-e66273961c8a
Murphy, Paul J.
9bfdf093-429c-45cc-b40a-e17e9e6ed20c
Teljeur, Conor
b0e899bc-f73e-47d3-99fb-c9827e921c5f
McGrath, Brid
f9b53cfb-8b43-4b33-992e-692af4ae85fa
Smith, Susan M.
07c10f2c-d7ee-4c7d-b414-c66d2001fb8f
Doherty, Niall
5ddcfbff-943a-4166-84cc-40da2a7fac50
Dimitrov, Borislav D.
366d715f-ffd9-45a1-8415-65de5488472f
Fahey, Tom
c0fd145a-af82-4c37-bce0-1c2e3e30c0f9

Keogh, Claire, Wallace, Emma, O'Brien, Kirsty K., Murphy, Paul J., Teljeur, Conor, McGrath, Brid, Smith, Susan M., Doherty, Niall, Dimitrov, Borislav D. and Fahey, Tom (2011) Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a web-based register. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64 (8), 848-860. (doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.011). (PMID:21411285)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: Identifying clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for primary care from electronic databases is difficult. This study aims to identify a search filter to optimize retrieval of these to establish a register of CPRs for the Cochrane Primary Health Care field.

Study Design and Setting: Thirty primary care journals were manually searched for CPRs. This was compared with electronic search filters using alternative methodologies: (1) textword searching; (2) proximity searching; (3) inclusion terms using specific phrases and truncation; (4) exclusion terms; and (5) combinations of methodologies.

Results: We manually searched 6,344 articles, revealing 41 CPRs. Across the 45 search filters, sensitivities ranged from 12% to 98%, whereas specificities ranged from 43% to 100%. There was generally a trade-off between the sensitivity and specificity of each filter (i.e., the number of CPRs and total number of articles retrieved). Combining textword searching with the inclusion terms (using specific phrases) resulted in the highest sensitivity (98%) but lower specificity (59%) than other methods. The associated precision (2%) and accuracy (60%) were also low.

Conclusion: The novel use of combining textword searching with inclusion terms was considered the most appropriate for updating a register of primary care CPRs where sensitivity has to be optimized.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 March 2011
Published date: August 2011
Keywords: clinical prediction rules, primary care, medical information retrieval, search filters, proximity searching, evidence-based medicine
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 337369
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/337369
PURE UUID: 937676ae-6e1a-4e4f-8ab2-dff7db966b1d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2012 12:50
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Claire Keogh
Author: Emma Wallace
Author: Kirsty K. O'Brien
Author: Paul J. Murphy
Author: Conor Teljeur
Author: Brid McGrath
Author: Susan M. Smith
Author: Niall Doherty
Author: Borislav D. Dimitrov
Author: Tom Fahey

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×