The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of screening risk and nonrisk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission in an acute care hospital

Creamer, Eilish, Galvin, Sandra, Dolan, Anthony, Sherlock, Orla, Dimitrov, Borislav D, Fitzgerald-Hughes, Deirdre, Thomas, Toney, Walsh, John, Moore, Joan, Smyth, Edmond G, Shore, Anna C, Sullivan, Derek, Kinnevey, Peter, O'Lorcain, Piaras, Cunney, Robert, Coleman, David C and Humphreys, Hilary (2012) Evaluation of screening risk and nonrisk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission in an acute care hospital American Journal of Infection Control, 40, (5), pp. 411-415. (doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.07.008). (PMID:21962934).

Record type: Article


Background: screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylocccus aureus (MRSA) is advocated as part of control measures, but screening all patients on admission to hospital may not be cost-effective.

Objective: our objective was to evaluate the additional yield of screening all patients on admission compared with only patients with risk factors and to assess cost aspects.

Methods: a prospective, nonrandomized observational study of screening nonrisk patients ?72 hours of admission compared with only screening patients with risk factors over 3 years in a tertiary referral hospital was conducted. We also assessed the costs of screening both groups.

Results: a total of 48 of 892 (5%) patients was MRSA positive; 28 of 314 (9%) during year 1, 12 of 257 (5%) during year 2, and 8 of 321 (2%) during year 3. There were significantly fewer MRSA-positive patients among nonrisk compared with MRSA-risk patients: 4 of 340 (1%) versus 44 of 552 (8%), P ? .0001, respectively. However, screening nonrisk patients increased the number of screening samples by 62% with a proportionate increase in the costs of screening. A backward stepwise logistic regression model identified age > 70 years, diagnosis of chronic pulmonary disease, previous MRSA infection, and admission to hospital during the previous 18 months as the most important independent predictors to discriminate between MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative patients on admission (94.3% accuracy, P < .001).

Conclusion: screening patients without risk factors increased the number of screenings and costs but resulted in few additional cases being detected. In a hospital where MRSA is endemic, targeted screening of at-risk patients on admission remains the most efficient strategy for the early identification of MRSA-positive patients

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: September 2011
Published date: 2012
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences


Local EPrints ID: 337418
ISSN: 0196-6553
PURE UUID: aeff22fe-83fe-4a52-9335-fc68efd2a7b0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Apr 2012 07:35
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 06:03

Export record



Author: Eilish Creamer
Author: Sandra Galvin
Author: Anthony Dolan
Author: Orla Sherlock
Author: Borislav D Dimitrov
Author: Deirdre Fitzgerald-Hughes
Author: Toney Thomas
Author: John Walsh
Author: Joan Moore
Author: Edmond G Smyth
Author: Anna C Shore
Author: Derek Sullivan
Author: Peter Kinnevey
Author: Piaras O'Lorcain
Author: Robert Cunney
Author: David C Coleman
Author: Hilary Humphreys

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.