The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Writing: the process of discovery

Writing: the process of discovery
Writing: the process of discovery
This paper describes the results of a study investigating the process by which writers develop their understanding through writing. It argues that, contrary to problem-solving models of writing, the crucial ingredient is implicitly guided text production. Two groups of writers, varying in the extent to which their writing is assumed to be directed towards rhetorical goals, were asked to write either planned or non-planned texts. Key-stroke logs were collected, and changes in subjective understanding about the topic were measured. The results show that developments of understanding are strongly related to the extent to which writers modify their texts during writing, and this is highest in the conditions expected to promote implicitly guided text production. We conclude that these findings support a dual-process model of writing
1774-1779
Cognitive Science Society
Baaijen, Veerle
12cc97bf-1cbd-46fb-817f-da0302dff154
Galbraith, David
c4914b0d-4fd1-4127-91aa-4e8afee72ff1
de Glopper, Kees
25144f3c-39d3-4f03-8367-0f82d34f8353
Baaijen, Veerle
12cc97bf-1cbd-46fb-817f-da0302dff154
Galbraith, David
c4914b0d-4fd1-4127-91aa-4e8afee72ff1
de Glopper, Kees
25144f3c-39d3-4f03-8367-0f82d34f8353

Baaijen, Veerle, Galbraith, David and de Glopper, Kees (2010) Writing: the process of discovery. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 1774-1779 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a study investigating the process by which writers develop their understanding through writing. It argues that, contrary to problem-solving models of writing, the crucial ingredient is implicitly guided text production. Two groups of writers, varying in the extent to which their writing is assumed to be directed towards rhetorical goals, were asked to write either planned or non-planned texts. Key-stroke logs were collected, and changes in subjective understanding about the topic were measured. The results show that developments of understanding are strongly related to the extent to which writers modify their texts during writing, and this is highest in the conditions expected to promote implicitly guided text production. We conclude that these findings support a dual-process model of writing

Text
Baaijen,_Galbraith_&_de_Glopper,_2010.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2010
Venue - Dates: 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science, Portland, United States, 2010-08-11 - 2010-08-14
Organisations: Southampton Education School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 337492
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/337492
PURE UUID: 1ca581e5-cf69-490b-b85d-d37e632bf54b
ORCID for David Galbraith: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-6386

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Apr 2012 07:42
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: Veerle Baaijen
Author: David Galbraith ORCID iD
Author: Kees de Glopper

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×