The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do treatment preferences for patients with angina change? An 18-month follow-up study

Do treatment preferences for patients with angina change? An 18-month follow-up study
Do treatment preferences for patients with angina change? An 18-month follow-up study
Objectives:? To assess whether preferences for patients with angina changed at 18-month follow-up using the Patient Preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment (PPQA).
Background:? Evidence suggests that patients want information about treatment options. Reliable measurement of patient preferences for treatment is important for empowering patients.
Design:? Postal self-administered questionnaire survey at baseline and follow-up. The preference questionnaire comprised 18 items about the main treatments for angina: medication, angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Setting and participants:? Patients with diagnosed angina from seven participating general practices across England. The sample comprised 222 patients with angina who responded to both baseline and follow-up treatment preference questionnaires.
Results:? Most patients’ condition and preferences scores for treatment remained stable over 18 months. An exception was angioplasty preference scores, which indicated more negative attitudes towards this procedure over time. People aged over 75 years least preferred angioplasty. There were no associations between any changes in condition and changes in preferences. However, within-subject agreement could vary by ±5 to 7 points between baseline and follow-up, with stability apparently worst for the medication and best for surgery sub-scales, raising the question of what represents reasonable stability.
Conclusion:? These results suggest preferences are relatively stable, even where there are changes in health, and provide further evidence of the utility (in particular, reliability) of the PPQA. However, this stability in scores did mask some movement in scale scores and in patients’ first-ranked treatment choices, showing changing preferences largely from angioplasty to CABG and vice versa, indicating the complexity of preferences
angina, patient preferences
1369-6513
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Reeves, Barnaby C.
3d10eab6-24a5-41c7-8ecc-8b5ace0f25ff
Rowe, Gene
59f8beaf-c7bb-4929-84f5-2129cc646712
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Reeves, Barnaby C.
3d10eab6-24a5-41c7-8ecc-8b5ace0f25ff
Rowe, Gene
59f8beaf-c7bb-4929-84f5-2129cc646712

Bowling, Ann, Reeves, Barnaby C. and Rowe, Gene (2011) Do treatment preferences for patients with angina change? An 18-month follow-up study. Health Expectations. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00680.x). (PMID:21726362)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives:? To assess whether preferences for patients with angina changed at 18-month follow-up using the Patient Preferences Questionnaire for Angina treatment (PPQA).
Background:? Evidence suggests that patients want information about treatment options. Reliable measurement of patient preferences for treatment is important for empowering patients.
Design:? Postal self-administered questionnaire survey at baseline and follow-up. The preference questionnaire comprised 18 items about the main treatments for angina: medication, angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Setting and participants:? Patients with diagnosed angina from seven participating general practices across England. The sample comprised 222 patients with angina who responded to both baseline and follow-up treatment preference questionnaires.
Results:? Most patients’ condition and preferences scores for treatment remained stable over 18 months. An exception was angioplasty preference scores, which indicated more negative attitudes towards this procedure over time. People aged over 75 years least preferred angioplasty. There were no associations between any changes in condition and changes in preferences. However, within-subject agreement could vary by ±5 to 7 points between baseline and follow-up, with stability apparently worst for the medication and best for surgery sub-scales, raising the question of what represents reasonable stability.
Conclusion:? These results suggest preferences are relatively stable, even where there are changes in health, and provide further evidence of the utility (in particular, reliability) of the PPQA. However, this stability in scores did mask some movement in scale scores and in patients’ first-ranked treatment choices, showing changing preferences largely from angioplasty to CABG and vice versa, indicating the complexity of preferences

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 4 July 2011
Keywords: angina, patient preferences
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 337613
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/337613
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 6c2612f7-e870-4e2d-9dce-e440906b2f51

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Apr 2012 14:43
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 10:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ann Bowling
Author: Barnaby C. Reeves
Author: Gene Rowe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×