Clinging to the wreckage? Gender and the legacy of class
Clinging to the wreckage? Gender and the legacy of class
The paper argues that the class legacy has had profoundly negative consequences for accounts of material gender inequality, and that even where gender theorists have attempted to move beyond class, they have been hampered by the fragments of class theory. It will be argued that whilst gender has posed a fundamental challenge to class analysis, the reconstructions which have been attempted have not escaped the central assumptions of class theory. The weakness of such reconstructions – hindered by flaws inherited from both the Marxian and neo-Weberian traditions of class analysis – has led some post-modern writers to question the very idea of a determinate, structural account of gender. At the time of writing, deconstruction – rather than reconstruction – is in the ascendant. However, whilst a structural account of gender can and should be defended, past attempts show that this cannot be achieved by clinging to the assumptions of class analysis, or by developing additive ‘class-plus-gender’ explanations. Only those approaches which reject the economistic assumptions of class, by placing emphasis on the social space as a differentiated and determinate social whole, can overcome the limitations of current accounts of gender.
class analysis, differentiation, gender, postmodernism, social space, theory
469-490
Bottero, Wendy
2da4e792-ecef-4406-bba1-913f03dedecd
1 August 1998
Bottero, Wendy
2da4e792-ecef-4406-bba1-913f03dedecd
Abstract
The paper argues that the class legacy has had profoundly negative consequences for accounts of material gender inequality, and that even where gender theorists have attempted to move beyond class, they have been hampered by the fragments of class theory. It will be argued that whilst gender has posed a fundamental challenge to class analysis, the reconstructions which have been attempted have not escaped the central assumptions of class theory. The weakness of such reconstructions – hindered by flaws inherited from both the Marxian and neo-Weberian traditions of class analysis – has led some post-modern writers to question the very idea of a determinate, structural account of gender. At the time of writing, deconstruction – rather than reconstruction – is in the ascendant. However, whilst a structural account of gender can and should be defended, past attempts show that this cannot be achieved by clinging to the assumptions of class analysis, or by developing additive ‘class-plus-gender’ explanations. Only those approaches which reject the economistic assumptions of class, by placing emphasis on the social space as a differentiated and determinate social whole, can overcome the limitations of current accounts of gender.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 August 1998
Keywords:
class analysis, differentiation, gender, postmodernism, social space, theory
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33814
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33814
ISSN: 0038-0385
PURE UUID: 7e4e0cc0-7f42-46ec-bdc5-c489369e84f6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Dec 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Wendy Bottero
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics