The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Elderly people and the boundary between health and social care 1946-91: Whose responsibility?

Elderly people and the boundary between health and social care 1946-91: Whose responsibility?
Elderly people and the boundary between health and social care 1946-91: Whose responsibility?
Since the 1990s, the boundary between health and social care has increasingly been recognised as a major policy issue with regard to provision for elderly people. Yet the boundary is far from new: a division between the two services has existed since 1946. This study presents a thorough investigation of central government's policy, based on archival sources. It shows that while the problem has been defined differently over time, there has been more continuity than change. The boundary issue has manifested itself as a struggle over the respective responsibilities of health and local authorities, with both seeking to avoid caring for a growing group of people in need of nursing and/or medical attention on a regular, but not constant, basis. Health officials, worried about the growing costs of hospital care and influenced by hospital doctors, increasingly sided with the health authorities, but without openly discussing the implications of a shift of responsibilities to local authorities.
1902089391
Nuffield Trust
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Lewis, Jane
fedf6efc-800b-4fb0-b91b-fa6f31ef0f59
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Lewis, Jane
fedf6efc-800b-4fb0-b91b-fa6f31ef0f59

Bridgen, Paul and Lewis, Jane (1999) Elderly people and the boundary between health and social care 1946-91: Whose responsibility? , London, UK. Nuffield Trust, 124pp.

Record type: Book

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the boundary between health and social care has increasingly been recognised as a major policy issue with regard to provision for elderly people. Yet the boundary is far from new: a division between the two services has existed since 1946. This study presents a thorough investigation of central government's policy, based on archival sources. It shows that while the problem has been defined differently over time, there has been more continuity than change. The boundary issue has manifested itself as a struggle over the respective responsibilities of health and local authorities, with both seeking to avoid caring for a growing group of people in need of nursing and/or medical attention on a regular, but not constant, basis. Health officials, worried about the growing costs of hospital care and influenced by hospital doctors, increasingly sided with the health authorities, but without openly discussing the implications of a shift of responsibilities to local authorities.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 December 1999

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 33820
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33820
ISBN: 1902089391
PURE UUID: ca79375e-404f-47f1-b09f-aba0fd7c759f
ORCID for Paul Bridgen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-3254

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jan 2008
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:05

Export record

Contributors

Author: Paul Bridgen ORCID iD
Author: Jane Lewis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×