The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites

Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites
Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites
This article recounts the methodological story of a qualitative research project that investigated the work of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain and the news media’s deconstruction of the Commission’s report – the Parekh Report – which was published on 11 October 2000. Our project used a multi-method fieldwork approach, combining textual analysis of news media coverage and the extensive documentary archives of the Commission, along with semi-structured interviews with Commissioners and other figures involved in the publication of the Report. The article attempts to offer a reflexive account of the experiences of interviewing a particular public policy-making elite and examines how a particular ‘public trauma’ – that is, the damaging political fall-out of extremely negative news media coverage of the Parekh Report – inflected our research encounters. We argue that the openness with which many of the participants spoke about this traumatic experience suggests that the production of policy documents can constitute highly emotional labour for participants. We extend this argument by examining how this openness also reveals the instabilities and uncertainties of power within the research interviewee/interviewer relationship. In this way the article seeks to contribute to debates about the problems of defining the category ‘elites’ in both public policy and social research worlds.
0047-2794
689-707
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc

Neal, Sarah and McLaughlin, Eugene (2009) Researching up? Interviews, emotionality and policy-making elites. Journal of Social Policy, 38 (4), 689-707. (doi:10.1017/S0047279409990018).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article recounts the methodological story of a qualitative research project that investigated the work of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain and the news media’s deconstruction of the Commission’s report – the Parekh Report – which was published on 11 October 2000. Our project used a multi-method fieldwork approach, combining textual analysis of news media coverage and the extensive documentary archives of the Commission, along with semi-structured interviews with Commissioners and other figures involved in the publication of the Report. The article attempts to offer a reflexive account of the experiences of interviewing a particular public policy-making elite and examines how a particular ‘public trauma’ – that is, the damaging political fall-out of extremely negative news media coverage of the Parekh Report – inflected our research encounters. We argue that the openness with which many of the participants spoke about this traumatic experience suggests that the production of policy documents can constitute highly emotional labour for participants. We extend this argument by examining how this openness also reveals the instabilities and uncertainties of power within the research interviewee/interviewer relationship. In this way the article seeks to contribute to debates about the problems of defining the category ‘elites’ in both public policy and social research worlds.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 24 June 2009
Organisations: Social Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 338238
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/338238
ISSN: 0047-2794
PURE UUID: 22811ea0-755a-41a7-8d22-f6553bc85bbc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2012 09:16
Last modified: 16 Jul 2019 22:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×