The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting

Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting
Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting
BACKGROUND: The past 10 years have seen an improvement in sequence data quality due to the introduction of capillary sequencers and new sequencing chemistries. In parallel, new software programs for automated mutation detection have been developed. We evaluated the sensitivity of semiautomated unidirectional sequence analysis for the detection of heterozygous base substitutions using the Mutation Surveyor software package.

METHODS: Detection rates for heterozygous base substitutions in 29 genes by automated and visual inspection were compared. Examples of heterozygous bases not detected in one direction during bidirectional analysis were also sought through a national survey of United Kingdom (UK) genetics laboratories. Sequence quality was assessed in a consecutive cohort of 50 patients for whom the 39 exons of the ABCC8 gene had been sequenced in one direction.

RESULTS: A total of 701 different heterozygous base substitutions were detected by the software with no false negatives (sensitivity >or=99.57%). Four examples of heterozygous bases missed in one direction during bidirectional analysis were reported. Two were detected using unidirectional analysis settings, and the other two bases had low-quality scores. Of the 1950 amplicons examined, 97.2% had a quality score >or=30 and an average PHRED-like score >or=50 for the defined region of interest, and 98.1% of the 323,650 bases had a PHRED score >40.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a requirement for bidirectional sequencing. Semiautomated analysis of good quality unidirectional sequence data has high sensitivity and is suitable for heterozygote mutation scanning in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Further work is required to determine minimum quality parameters for semiautomated analysis.

1945-0265
381-386
Ellard, Sian
6c9b0ede-8980-4602-b063-444b165baa09
Shields, Beverley
246c4f77-3e70-48eb-870e-656263330751
Tysoe, Carolyn
7596872c-2f19-439d-b0ae-ec8e34f85b4e
Treacy, Rebecca
f7e39f44-1e40-4e5a-a1f3-fa5698b2a78c
Yau, Shu
2f3f0eeb-da8a-4a66-b765-ed8cf761dfdd
Mattocks, Christopher
2d943111-cfdf-4f0d-9ecc-0737e541fe36
Wallace, Andrew
94c565bc-4c46-47ef-b67b-fea558f4a97f
Ellard, Sian
6c9b0ede-8980-4602-b063-444b165baa09
Shields, Beverley
246c4f77-3e70-48eb-870e-656263330751
Tysoe, Carolyn
7596872c-2f19-439d-b0ae-ec8e34f85b4e
Treacy, Rebecca
f7e39f44-1e40-4e5a-a1f3-fa5698b2a78c
Yau, Shu
2f3f0eeb-da8a-4a66-b765-ed8cf761dfdd
Mattocks, Christopher
2d943111-cfdf-4f0d-9ecc-0737e541fe36
Wallace, Andrew
94c565bc-4c46-47ef-b67b-fea558f4a97f

Ellard, Sian, Shields, Beverley, Tysoe, Carolyn, Treacy, Rebecca, Yau, Shu, Mattocks, Christopher and Wallace, Andrew (2009) Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 13 (3), 381-386. (doi:10.1089/gtmb.2008.0096). (PMID:19405871)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The past 10 years have seen an improvement in sequence data quality due to the introduction of capillary sequencers and new sequencing chemistries. In parallel, new software programs for automated mutation detection have been developed. We evaluated the sensitivity of semiautomated unidirectional sequence analysis for the detection of heterozygous base substitutions using the Mutation Surveyor software package.

METHODS: Detection rates for heterozygous base substitutions in 29 genes by automated and visual inspection were compared. Examples of heterozygous bases not detected in one direction during bidirectional analysis were also sought through a national survey of United Kingdom (UK) genetics laboratories. Sequence quality was assessed in a consecutive cohort of 50 patients for whom the 39 exons of the ABCC8 gene had been sequenced in one direction.

RESULTS: A total of 701 different heterozygous base substitutions were detected by the software with no false negatives (sensitivity >or=99.57%). Four examples of heterozygous bases missed in one direction during bidirectional analysis were reported. Two were detected using unidirectional analysis settings, and the other two bases had low-quality scores. Of the 1950 amplicons examined, 97.2% had a quality score >or=30 and an average PHRED-like score >or=50 for the defined region of interest, and 98.1% of the 323,650 bases had a PHRED score >40.

CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a requirement for bidirectional sequencing. Semiautomated analysis of good quality unidirectional sequence data has high sensitivity and is suitable for heterozygote mutation scanning in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Further work is required to determine minimum quality parameters for semiautomated analysis.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 30 April 2009
Published date: June 2009
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 338329
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/338329
ISSN: 1945-0265
PURE UUID: effaaae7-12eb-434f-b957-65515b671c9d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 May 2012 13:22
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sian Ellard
Author: Beverley Shields
Author: Carolyn Tysoe
Author: Rebecca Treacy
Author: Shu Yau
Author: Christopher Mattocks
Author: Andrew Wallace

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×