The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of the reproducibility of the parameters of the ¹³C-aminopyrine breath test for the assessment of hepatic function.

Afolabi, Paul R., Wright, Mark, Wootton, Steve and Jackson, Alan A. (2011) A comparison of the reproducibility of the parameters of the ¹³C-aminopyrine breath test for the assessment of hepatic function. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 47, (3), pp. 390-399. (doi:10.1080/10256016.2011.595791). (PMID:21745035).

Record type: Article


This study determined the within-subject and between-subject variability of different ways of expressing the results of the (13)C-aminopyrine breath test ((13)C-ABT) and the effect of shortening the test duration. The (13)C-ABT was conducted on three separate occasions in 10 healthy volunteers and on a single occasion in 22 patients with established liver cirrhosis. The within-subject variability of cumulative percentage dose recovered (cPDR), using measured CO(2) production rate (VCO(2)), in the reference group over three trials was 15% over 120 min. Higher within-subject variability in cPDR would have been evident if the test was terminated at either 30 or 60 min. Substitution of predicted VCO(2) to calculate cPDR yielded comparable values at all time points. Significant differences between cirrhotics and reference group were evident after just 10 min using PDR/h, cPDR or enrichment (all P<0.05). The ABT demonstrates clinically acceptable reproducibility. Shortening of the duration may make the test more acceptable clinically, but it is associated with increasing imprecision.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 6 September 2011
Published date: September 2011
Organisations: Human Development & Health


Local EPrints ID: 338929
ISSN: 1025-6016
PURE UUID: 9a4b4979-de55-4642-8ea0-7085a6d029ab
ORCID for Paul R. Afolabi: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2012 14:12
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 05:56

Export record



Author: Paul R. Afolabi ORCID iD
Author: Mark Wright
Author: Steve Wootton
Author: Alan A. Jackson

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.