Social democracy, unions, and pension politics in Germany and Sweden
Social democracy, unions, and pension politics in Germany and Sweden
This article investigates the politics of reforming mature, PAYG public pensions in the context of austerity. In both Sweden and Germany, the Social Democratic party leadership advocated reform in response to similar financial and demographic pressures, but the Swedish reform was more successful in correcting perceived program weaknesses and in defending social democratic values. To explain this difference in outcomes, we focus on policy legacies and the organizational and political capacities of labor movements. We argue that existing pension policies in Germany were more constraining in Germany than in Sweden, narrowing the range of politically feasible strategies. In contrast, existing pension policy in Sweden provided opportunities for 'turning vices into virtues' and for financing the transition to a new system. In addition, the narrow interests of German unions and the absence of institutionalized cooperation with the Social Democratic Party hindered reform. In contrast, the Swedish Social Democrats' bargaining position in the pension reform negotiations with the non-socialist parties was formulated with blue collar union interests in mind. The encompassing interests of Swedish unions and their close links with the Social Democrats facilitated a reform compromise.
23-54
Anderson, Karen M.
219ba2d8-cef1-42f9-8153-19b855784e7d
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
2003
Anderson, Karen M.
219ba2d8-cef1-42f9-8153-19b855784e7d
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
Anderson, Karen M. and Meyer, Traute
(2003)
Social democracy, unions, and pension politics in Germany and Sweden.
Journal of Public Policy, 23 (1), .
(doi:10.1017/S0143814X03003027).
Abstract
This article investigates the politics of reforming mature, PAYG public pensions in the context of austerity. In both Sweden and Germany, the Social Democratic party leadership advocated reform in response to similar financial and demographic pressures, but the Swedish reform was more successful in correcting perceived program weaknesses and in defending social democratic values. To explain this difference in outcomes, we focus on policy legacies and the organizational and political capacities of labor movements. We argue that existing pension policies in Germany were more constraining in Germany than in Sweden, narrowing the range of politically feasible strategies. In contrast, existing pension policy in Sweden provided opportunities for 'turning vices into virtues' and for financing the transition to a new system. In addition, the narrow interests of German unions and the absence of institutionalized cooperation with the Social Democratic Party hindered reform. In contrast, the Swedish Social Democrats' bargaining position in the pension reform negotiations with the non-socialist parties was formulated with blue collar union interests in mind. The encompassing interests of Swedish unions and their close links with the Social Democrats facilitated a reform compromise.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33893
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33893
ISSN: 0143-814X
PURE UUID: 01aeac55-ed26-4c35-9e63-3a77520dc2c8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Karen M. Anderson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics