The impact of delirium on the prediction of in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients
The impact of delirium on the prediction of in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients
Introduction: predictive models, such as acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II), are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) to estimate mortality. Although the presence of delirium is associated with a higher mortality in ICU patients, delirium is not part of the APACHE-II model. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether delirium, present within 24 hours after ICU admission, improves the predictive value of the APACHE-II score.
Methods: in a prospective cohort study 2116 adult patients admitted between February 2008 and February 2009 were screened for delirium with the confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU). Exclusion criteria were sustained coma and unable to understand Dutch. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the predicted probabilities in the model with and without delirium. Calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (HL-test) were used to assess calibration. The discriminatory power of the models was analyzed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and AUCs were compared using the Z-test.
Results: 1740 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 332 (19%) were delirious at the time of ICU admission or within 24 hours after admission. Delirium was associated with in-hospital mortality in unadjusted models, odds ratio (OR): 3.22 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23 - 4.66). The OR between the APACHE-II and in-hospital mortality was 1.15 (95% CI 1.12 - 1.19) per point. The predictive accuracy of the APACHE-II did not improve after adding delirium, both in the total group as well as in the subgroup without cardiac surgery patients. The AUC of the APACHE model without delirium was 0.77 (0.73 - 0.81) and 0.78 (0.74 - 0.82) when delirium was added to the model. The z-value was 0.92 indicating no improvement in discriminative power, and the HL-test and calibration plots indicated no improvement in calibration.
Conclusions: although delirium is a significant predictor of mortality in ICU patients, adding delirium as an additional variable to the APACHE-II model does not result in an improvement in its predictive estimates
R146-[5pp]
Van den Boogaard, M.
957b111a-8c54-4cd1-87ff-c8852198eacd
Peters, Sanne A.E.
22b95ac8-3362-4a03-8321-474d386b1656
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
78ca86cf-76cd-4578-b063-649414423b43
Dagnelie, Pieter C.
59900e62-dd34-4bda-a766-a58328fd8e43
Leffers, Pieter
9c8454e1-c104-4b8d-b6b3-454650175ade
Pickkers, Peter
516df191-7ae2-457e-a7f7-abd6ca935687
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
3 August 2010
Van den Boogaard, M.
957b111a-8c54-4cd1-87ff-c8852198eacd
Peters, Sanne A.E.
22b95ac8-3362-4a03-8321-474d386b1656
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
78ca86cf-76cd-4578-b063-649414423b43
Dagnelie, Pieter C.
59900e62-dd34-4bda-a766-a58328fd8e43
Leffers, Pieter
9c8454e1-c104-4b8d-b6b3-454650175ade
Pickkers, Peter
516df191-7ae2-457e-a7f7-abd6ca935687
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Van den Boogaard, M., Peters, Sanne A.E., van der Hoeven, Johannes G., Dagnelie, Pieter C., Leffers, Pieter, Pickkers, Peter and Schoonhoven, Lisette
(2010)
The impact of delirium on the prediction of in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients.
Critical Care, 14, .
(doi:10.1186/cc9214).
(PMID:20682037)
Abstract
Introduction: predictive models, such as acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II), are widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) to estimate mortality. Although the presence of delirium is associated with a higher mortality in ICU patients, delirium is not part of the APACHE-II model. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether delirium, present within 24 hours after ICU admission, improves the predictive value of the APACHE-II score.
Methods: in a prospective cohort study 2116 adult patients admitted between February 2008 and February 2009 were screened for delirium with the confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU). Exclusion criteria were sustained coma and unable to understand Dutch. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the predicted probabilities in the model with and without delirium. Calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (HL-test) were used to assess calibration. The discriminatory power of the models was analyzed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and AUCs were compared using the Z-test.
Results: 1740 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 332 (19%) were delirious at the time of ICU admission or within 24 hours after admission. Delirium was associated with in-hospital mortality in unadjusted models, odds ratio (OR): 3.22 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23 - 4.66). The OR between the APACHE-II and in-hospital mortality was 1.15 (95% CI 1.12 - 1.19) per point. The predictive accuracy of the APACHE-II did not improve after adding delirium, both in the total group as well as in the subgroup without cardiac surgery patients. The AUC of the APACHE model without delirium was 0.77 (0.73 - 0.81) and 0.78 (0.74 - 0.82) when delirium was added to the model. The z-value was 0.92 indicating no improvement in discriminative power, and the HL-test and calibration plots indicated no improvement in calibration.
Conclusions: although delirium is a significant predictor of mortality in ICU patients, adding delirium as an additional variable to the APACHE-II model does not result in an improvement in its predictive estimates
Text
Boogaard_et_al_Impact_of_delirium_prediction_of_in_hospital_morbidity.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 3 August 2010
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 339217
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339217
ISSN: 1364-8535
PURE UUID: b9d94f41-e1f5-4d32-b1cb-99d0457dd855
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 May 2012 10:29
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M. Van den Boogaard
Author:
Sanne A.E. Peters
Author:
Johannes G. van der Hoeven
Author:
Pieter C. Dagnelie
Author:
Pieter Leffers
Author:
Peter Pickkers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics