The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pain management: a review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients

Pain management: a review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients
Pain management: a review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients
Aims and objectives:?This paper reports a review of the literature conducted to identify organisation models in cancer pain management that contain integrated care processes and describe their effectiveness.

Background:?Pain is experienced by 30–50% of cancer patients receiving treatment and by 70–90% of those with advanced disease. Efforts to improve pain management have been made through the development and dissemination of clinical guidelines. Early improvements in pain management were focussed on just one or two single processes such as pain assessment and patient education. Little is known about organisational models with multiple integrated processes throughout the course of the disease trajectory and concerning all stages of the care process.

Design:?Systematic review.

Method:?The review involved a systematic search of the literature, published between 1986–2006. Subject-specific keywords used to describe patients, disease, pain management interventions and integrated care processes, relevant for this review were selected using the thesaurus of the databases.

Conclusion:?Institutional models, clinical pathways and consultation services are three alternative models for the integration of care processes in cancer pain management. A clinical pathway is a comprehensive institutionalisation model, whereas a pain consultation service is a ‘stand-alone’ model that can be integrated in a clinical pathway. Positive patient and process outcomes have been described for all three models, although the level of evidence is generally low. Evaluation of the quality of pain management must involve standardised measurements of both patient and process outcomes.

Relevance to clinical practice:?We recommend the development of policies for referrals to a pain consultation service. These policies can be integrated within a clinical pathway. To evaluate the effectiveness of pain management models standardised outcome measures are needed.
cancer pain management, effectiveness, integrated processes, nursing, organisation models, systematic review
0962-1067
1986-2000
Brink-Huis, A.
9a21ad41-8ce3-4039-856a-9d7d668d93ab
Schoonhoven, L.
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
van Achterberg, T.
1b413585-49b3-4989-a1b6-7fb4d4bac453
Brink-Huis, A.
9a21ad41-8ce3-4039-856a-9d7d668d93ab
Schoonhoven, L.
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
van Achterberg, T.
1b413585-49b3-4989-a1b6-7fb4d4bac453

Brink-Huis, A., Schoonhoven, L. and van Achterberg, T. (2008) Pain management: a review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17 (15), 1986-2000. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02228.x). (PMID:187505779)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims and objectives:?This paper reports a review of the literature conducted to identify organisation models in cancer pain management that contain integrated care processes and describe their effectiveness.

Background:?Pain is experienced by 30–50% of cancer patients receiving treatment and by 70–90% of those with advanced disease. Efforts to improve pain management have been made through the development and dissemination of clinical guidelines. Early improvements in pain management were focussed on just one or two single processes such as pain assessment and patient education. Little is known about organisational models with multiple integrated processes throughout the course of the disease trajectory and concerning all stages of the care process.

Design:?Systematic review.

Method:?The review involved a systematic search of the literature, published between 1986–2006. Subject-specific keywords used to describe patients, disease, pain management interventions and integrated care processes, relevant for this review were selected using the thesaurus of the databases.

Conclusion:?Institutional models, clinical pathways and consultation services are three alternative models for the integration of care processes in cancer pain management. A clinical pathway is a comprehensive institutionalisation model, whereas a pain consultation service is a ‘stand-alone’ model that can be integrated in a clinical pathway. Positive patient and process outcomes have been described for all three models, although the level of evidence is generally low. Evaluation of the quality of pain management must involve standardised measurements of both patient and process outcomes.

Relevance to clinical practice:?We recommend the development of policies for referrals to a pain consultation service. These policies can be integrated within a clinical pathway. To evaluate the effectiveness of pain management models standardised outcome measures are needed.

Text
Brink-Huis_et_al_Pain_management_reivew_of_organisation_models_adult_cancer.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 July 2008
Published date: August 2008
Keywords: cancer pain management, effectiveness, integrated processes, nursing, organisation models, systematic review
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339233
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339233
ISSN: 0962-1067
PURE UUID: 9f7b7605-a272-4590-8e10-818961d3cbac
ORCID for L. Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2012 11:00
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Brink-Huis
Author: L. Schoonhoven ORCID iD
Author: T. van Achterberg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×