The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measuring verbal communication in initial physical therapy encounters

Measuring verbal communication in initial physical therapy encounters
Measuring verbal communication in initial physical therapy encounters
Background: Communication in clinical encounters is vital in ensuring a positive experience and outcome for both patient and clinician.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure verbal communication between physical therapists and patients with back pain during their initial consultation and trial management of the data using a novel, Web-based application.

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted.

Methods: Nine musculoskeletal physical therapists and 27 patients with back pain participated in this study. Twenty-five initial consultations were observed, audio recorded, and categorized using the Medical Communications Behavior System. Data were managed using Synote, a freely available application enabling synchronization of audio recordings with transcripts and coded notes.

Results: In this sample, physical therapists spoke for 49.5% of the encounter and patients for 33.1%. Providers and patients spent little time overtly discussing emotions (1.4% and 0.9%, respectively). More-experienced clinicians used more “history/background probes,” more “advice/suggestion,” and less “restatement” than less-experienced staff, although they demonstrated a greater prevalence of talking concurrently and interrupting patients (7.6% compared with 2.6%).

Limitations: Although studies measuring actual behavior are considered to be the gold standard, audio recordings do not enable nonverbal behaviors to be recorded.

Conclusion: This study investigated a method for measuring the verbal content of clinical encounters in a physical therapy outpatient setting. The study has directly contributed to developing a research-friendly version of the application (ie, Synote Researcher). Given the pivotal role of communication in ensuring a positive experience and outcome for both patient and provider, investing time in further developing communication skills should be an on-going priority for providers. Further work is needed to explore affective behaviors and the prevalence of interrupting patients, considering differences in sex and provider experience.
0031-9023
479-491
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Whittle, C.
8df82fe7-6527-4281-b0b6-50b3ffc5c86c
Cleland, J.
9015a550-0b00-480c-85d8-88126d986570
Wald, M.
90577cfd-35ae-4e4a-9422-5acffecd89d5
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Whittle, C.
8df82fe7-6527-4281-b0b6-50b3ffc5c86c
Cleland, J.
9015a550-0b00-480c-85d8-88126d986570
Wald, M.
90577cfd-35ae-4e4a-9422-5acffecd89d5

Roberts, L., Whittle, C., Cleland, J. and Wald, M. (2013) Measuring verbal communication in initial physical therapy encounters. Physical Therapy, 93 (4), Spring Issue, 479-491. (doi:10.2522/ptj.20120089).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Communication in clinical encounters is vital in ensuring a positive experience and outcome for both patient and clinician.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure verbal communication between physical therapists and patients with back pain during their initial consultation and trial management of the data using a novel, Web-based application.

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted.

Methods: Nine musculoskeletal physical therapists and 27 patients with back pain participated in this study. Twenty-five initial consultations were observed, audio recorded, and categorized using the Medical Communications Behavior System. Data were managed using Synote, a freely available application enabling synchronization of audio recordings with transcripts and coded notes.

Results: In this sample, physical therapists spoke for 49.5% of the encounter and patients for 33.1%. Providers and patients spent little time overtly discussing emotions (1.4% and 0.9%, respectively). More-experienced clinicians used more “history/background probes,” more “advice/suggestion,” and less “restatement” than less-experienced staff, although they demonstrated a greater prevalence of talking concurrently and interrupting patients (7.6% compared with 2.6%).

Limitations: Although studies measuring actual behavior are considered to be the gold standard, audio recordings do not enable nonverbal behaviors to be recorded.

Conclusion: This study investigated a method for measuring the verbal content of clinical encounters in a physical therapy outpatient setting. The study has directly contributed to developing a research-friendly version of the application (ie, Synote Researcher). Given the pivotal role of communication in ensuring a positive experience and outcome for both patient and provider, investing time in further developing communication skills should be an on-going priority for providers. Further work is needed to explore affective behaviors and the prevalence of interrupting patients, considering differences in sex and provider experience.

Text
Synote therapy paper.doc - Other
Download (329kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 29 November 2012
Published date: April 2013
Organisations: Web & Internet Science, Physical & Rehabilitation Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339275
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339275
ISSN: 0031-9023
PURE UUID: aea48205-dd0e-495d-8f73-9974f901a858
ORCID for L. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6696

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2012 13:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Roberts ORCID iD
Author: C. Whittle
Author: J. Cleland
Author: M. Wald

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×