A per-pixel, non-stationary mixed model for empirical line atmospheric correction in remote sensing
A per-pixel, non-stationary mixed model for empirical line atmospheric correction in remote sensing
Atmospheric correction is a key stage in the processing of remotely sensed data. The empirical line method (ELM) is used widely to correct at-sensor radiance or DN to at-surface reflectance. It is based on a simple linear relationship between those two variables. Effective application of the model requires that it is estimated in a precise and unbiased fashion. The usual approach is to use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to model the relationship between the average reflectance and radiance for a small number (3 to 8) of ground targets (GTs) and then to apply the regression on a per-pixel basis to the image. This leads to a mismatch between the scale at which the model is estimated and the scale at which the model is applied. Further, this approach wastes information and can lead to inconsistent estimators. These problems are addressed in the new approach presented here. The model was estimated on a per-pixel rather than per-GT basis. This yielded consistent, precise estimators for the ELM, but placed stronger requirements on the modeling. Specifically spatial autocorrelation and non-constant variance (heteroskedasticity) in the model residuals needed to be addressed. This was undertaken using the linear mixed model (LMM), which is a model-based expression of the geostatistical method. Of particular interest is the use of a non-stationary LMM to address the heteroskedasticity.
The approach taken in this paper is of significance for a broader set of remote sensing applications. Regression and geostatistics are often applied, based typically on a stationary model. This paper shows how heteroskedasticity can be assessed and modeled using the non-stationary LMM. Heteroskedasticity is present in other remote sensing applications hence the non-stationary modeling approach, demonstrated here, is likely to be beneficial.
empirical line method (elm), linear mixed model (lmm), model-based geostatistics, heteroskedastic, non-stationarity
666-678
Hamm, N.A.S.
e6d796b7-1286-4a67-843e-296dd1c1ee82
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Milton, E.J.
f6cb5c0d-a5d4-47d7-860f-096de08e0c24
September 2012
Hamm, N.A.S.
e6d796b7-1286-4a67-843e-296dd1c1ee82
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Milton, E.J.
f6cb5c0d-a5d4-47d7-860f-096de08e0c24
Hamm, N.A.S., Atkinson, P.M. and Milton, E.J.
(2012)
A per-pixel, non-stationary mixed model for empirical line atmospheric correction in remote sensing.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 124, .
(doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.033).
Abstract
Atmospheric correction is a key stage in the processing of remotely sensed data. The empirical line method (ELM) is used widely to correct at-sensor radiance or DN to at-surface reflectance. It is based on a simple linear relationship between those two variables. Effective application of the model requires that it is estimated in a precise and unbiased fashion. The usual approach is to use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to model the relationship between the average reflectance and radiance for a small number (3 to 8) of ground targets (GTs) and then to apply the regression on a per-pixel basis to the image. This leads to a mismatch between the scale at which the model is estimated and the scale at which the model is applied. Further, this approach wastes information and can lead to inconsistent estimators. These problems are addressed in the new approach presented here. The model was estimated on a per-pixel rather than per-GT basis. This yielded consistent, precise estimators for the ELM, but placed stronger requirements on the modeling. Specifically spatial autocorrelation and non-constant variance (heteroskedasticity) in the model residuals needed to be addressed. This was undertaken using the linear mixed model (LMM), which is a model-based expression of the geostatistical method. Of particular interest is the use of a non-stationary LMM to address the heteroskedasticity.
The approach taken in this paper is of significance for a broader set of remote sensing applications. Regression and geostatistics are often applied, based typically on a stationary model. This paper shows how heteroskedasticity can be assessed and modeled using the non-stationary LMM. Heteroskedasticity is present in other remote sensing applications hence the non-stationary modeling approach, demonstrated here, is likely to be beneficial.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 July 2012
Published date: September 2012
Keywords:
empirical line method (elm), linear mixed model (lmm), model-based geostatistics, heteroskedastic, non-stationarity
Organisations:
Global Env Change & Earth Observation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 339299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339299
ISSN: 0034-4257
PURE UUID: 569d8e70-cf79-4ea0-82b7-0210f9fd6f0a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 May 2012 14:15
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
N.A.S. Hamm
Author:
P.M. Atkinson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics