The state, national identity and distributive justice. (In special issue: British national identity in a European context. Guest editor: Bhikhu Parekh)
The state, national identity and distributive justice. (In special issue: British national identity in a European context. Guest editor: Bhikhu Parekh)
This article explores the issue of whether socialists and left-liberals commit themselves to valuing a shared national identity by defending redistributive policies. It begins by criticising Michael Sandel's argument that Rawls and other 'deontological liberals' cannot defend principles of justice which require redistribution unless they view the self as partially constituted by its attachment to the community over which redistribution is to occur. It then focuses upon David Miller's claim that redistribution will receive widespread support on grounds of social justice only if citizens see themselves as fellow nationals. It argues that Miller's claim has some plausibility, but does not provide sufficiently strong grounds for aiming to foster a substantive shared national identity in societies such as Britain which contain a high degree of cultural pluralism.
241-254
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
April 1995
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
Mason, Andrew
(1995)
The state, national identity and distributive justice. (In special issue: British national identity in a European context. Guest editor: Bhikhu Parekh).
New Community, 21 (2), .
Abstract
This article explores the issue of whether socialists and left-liberals commit themselves to valuing a shared national identity by defending redistributive policies. It begins by criticising Michael Sandel's argument that Rawls and other 'deontological liberals' cannot defend principles of justice which require redistribution unless they view the self as partially constituted by its attachment to the community over which redistribution is to occur. It then focuses upon David Miller's claim that redistribution will receive widespread support on grounds of social justice only if citizens see themselves as fellow nationals. It argues that Miller's claim has some plausibility, but does not provide sufficiently strong grounds for aiming to foster a substantive shared national identity in societies such as Britain which contain a high degree of cultural pluralism.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 1995
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33935
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33935
ISSN: 0047-9586
PURE UUID: e51ab379-d9f0-435c-8694-f2cd21a6545f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Dec 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:22
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Mason
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics