The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Equality of opportunity, old and new

Equality of opportunity, old and new
Equality of opportunity, old and new
Forms of egalitarianism which permit inequalities of condition but only when they appropriately reflect individual choice have attracted considerable interest. They appeal because they promise an effective response to those who criticize egalitarianism for failing to hold people properly responsible for how well their lives are going.
These new forms of egalitarianism seem to occupy the same territory as what is usually termed ‘equality of opportunity’ and are sometimes regarded as offering a better interpretation of that ideal. However, the relationship between them and the traditional meritocratic understanding of equality of opportunity, which requires selection procedures to be designed to pick out the best-qualified candidates, is far from obvious. Are these new forms of egalitarianism compatible with this traditional understanding? Can they incorporate it or do they supersede it in some way?
0014-1704
760-781
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107

Mason, Andrew (2001) Equality of opportunity, old and new. Ethics, 111 (4), 760-781. (doi:10.1086/233572).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Forms of egalitarianism which permit inequalities of condition but only when they appropriately reflect individual choice have attracted considerable interest. They appeal because they promise an effective response to those who criticize egalitarianism for failing to hold people properly responsible for how well their lives are going.
These new forms of egalitarianism seem to occupy the same territory as what is usually termed ‘equality of opportunity’ and are sometimes regarded as offering a better interpretation of that ideal. However, the relationship between them and the traditional meritocratic understanding of equality of opportunity, which requires selection procedures to be designed to pick out the best-qualified candidates, is far from obvious. Are these new forms of egalitarianism compatible with this traditional understanding? Can they incorporate it or do they supersede it in some way?

Text
ETv111p760.web.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 33947
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33947
ISSN: 0014-1704
PURE UUID: 07eced64-6052-4744-9732-8ff6bee45f33

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Mason

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×