Equality of opportunity, old and new
Equality of opportunity, old and new
Forms of egalitarianism which permit inequalities of condition but only when they appropriately reflect individual choice have attracted considerable interest. They appeal because they promise an effective response to those who criticize egalitarianism for failing to hold people properly responsible for how well their lives are going.
These new forms of egalitarianism seem to occupy the same territory as what is usually termed ‘equality of opportunity’ and are sometimes regarded as offering a better interpretation of that ideal. However, the relationship between them and the traditional meritocratic understanding of equality of opportunity, which requires selection procedures to be designed to pick out the best-qualified candidates, is far from obvious. Are these new forms of egalitarianism compatible with this traditional understanding? Can they incorporate it or do they supersede it in some way?
760-781
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
2001
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
Mason, Andrew
(2001)
Equality of opportunity, old and new.
Ethics, 111 (4), .
(doi:10.1086/233572).
Abstract
Forms of egalitarianism which permit inequalities of condition but only when they appropriately reflect individual choice have attracted considerable interest. They appeal because they promise an effective response to those who criticize egalitarianism for failing to hold people properly responsible for how well their lives are going.
These new forms of egalitarianism seem to occupy the same territory as what is usually termed ‘equality of opportunity’ and are sometimes regarded as offering a better interpretation of that ideal. However, the relationship between them and the traditional meritocratic understanding of equality of opportunity, which requires selection procedures to be designed to pick out the best-qualified candidates, is far from obvious. Are these new forms of egalitarianism compatible with this traditional understanding? Can they incorporate it or do they supersede it in some way?
Text
ETv111p760.web.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33947
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33947
ISSN: 0014-1704
PURE UUID: 07eced64-6052-4744-9732-8ff6bee45f33
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Mason
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics