Thinking about the production and consumption of long-term care in Britain: does gender still matter?

Ungerson, Clare (2000) Thinking about the production and consumption of long-term care in Britain: does gender still matter? Journal of Social Policy, 29 (4), 623-643. (doi:10.1017/S0047279400006061).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article suggests that the literature on care, which originally was heavily influenced by a gendered perspective, has now taken on other important variables. However, it is argued that if we look at the particular impact of the marketisation and privatisation of long-term care, we can see that gender is still a useful perspective on the production of care, especially paid care. The reordering of the delivery of domiciliary care within the ‘mixed economy of welfare’ is having important effects on the labour market for care and is likely to lead to further inequalities between women, both now and in old age. The article proceeds to look at the impact of these inequalities on the consumption of care in old age, particularly by elderly women and considers factors that may provide women with the resources to purchase care and/or pay charges for care. The article argues that gender does still matter, but that its impact has to be understood within a context of growing inequalities between women, and an analysis that takes account of wider social and economic relations within kin networks and between generations.

This record has no associated files available for download.