Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission
Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission
This article examines the production and publication of the Parekh Report (2000) by drawing upon two related current debates - the decline of the public intellectual and the necessity for a public sociology. It argues that both of these debates have failed to engage with concrete examples of public intellectual labour, with the complexities of public communication and have been reticent as to which particular intellectual voices are able to enter the public sphere. The article argues that the intellectually orientated, multiculturally constituted Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain Commission which authored the report and the report’s moment of publication both offer sites in which these critiques can be developed. The article foregrounds the question as to who is entitled to inaugurate, participate in and shape public debates on race, nation, and national identity and evidences the difficulties of attempting to do so in a ‘race volatile’, anti-intellectual and heavily mediated political milieu.
britishness, identity, multicultural, nation, public
intellectuals, parekh Report, public sphere, race
910-930
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0
November 2007
McLaughlin, Eugene
06b690de-55d8-4167-9b81-3564463e40bc
Neal, Sarah
0eadc867-9ce1-4eb2-8968-48391252e7b0
McLaughlin, Eugene and Neal, Sarah
(2007)
Who can speak to race and nation? Intellectuals, public policy formation and the future of Multi-ethnic Britain Commission.
[in special issue: Rethinking Convergence/Culture]
Cultural Studies, 21 (6), .
(doi:10.1080/09502380701470791).
Abstract
This article examines the production and publication of the Parekh Report (2000) by drawing upon two related current debates - the decline of the public intellectual and the necessity for a public sociology. It argues that both of these debates have failed to engage with concrete examples of public intellectual labour, with the complexities of public communication and have been reticent as to which particular intellectual voices are able to enter the public sphere. The article argues that the intellectually orientated, multiculturally constituted Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain Commission which authored the report and the report’s moment of publication both offer sites in which these critiques can be developed. The article foregrounds the question as to who is entitled to inaugurate, participate in and shape public debates on race, nation, and national identity and evidences the difficulties of attempting to do so in a ‘race volatile’, anti-intellectual and heavily mediated political milieu.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 September 2007
Published date: November 2007
Keywords:
britishness, identity, multicultural, nation, public
intellectuals, parekh Report, public sphere, race
Organisations:
Social Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 339764
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339764
ISSN: 0950-2386
PURE UUID: 127f45e6-7978-4c2f-bedd-8bbfcfcb8372
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 May 2012 08:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eugene McLaughlin
Author:
Sarah Neal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics